Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Managing digital transformation: The view from the top
2022134 citationsMaria Gonzalez, José Gascó et al.profile →
Citations per year, relative to Maria Gonzalez Maria Gonzalez (= 1×)
peers
José Gascó
Countries citing papers authored by Maria Gonzalez
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Maria Gonzalez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maria Gonzalez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maria Gonzalez more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maria Gonzalez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maria Gonzalez. The network helps show where Maria Gonzalez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maria Gonzalez
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maria Gonzalez.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maria Gonzalez based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Maria Gonzalez. Maria Gonzalez is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gonzalez, Maria, José Gascó, & Juan Llopis. (2024). Towards organisation 4.0. An empirical study. International Journal of Information Management. 75. 102746–102746.4 indexed citations
3.
Llopis, Juan, et al.. (2020). Integration of ICT into the higher education process: The case of Colombia. Journal of Small Business Strategy. 30(1). 58–67.17 indexed citations
4.
Gonzalez, Maria, José Gascó, & Juan Llopis. (2014). ICT in higher education: an experience with e-books. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
5.
Gonzalez, Maria, Juan Llopis, & José Gascó. (2013). Redes sociales en industrias culturales: opiniones desde la praxis. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 67–76.2 indexed citations
6.
Gonzalez, Maria, José Gascó, & Juan Llopis. (2011). Relaciones entre "outsourcing" y estrategia en los ayuntamientos españoles. RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante). 33–46.5 indexed citations
7.
Gonzalez, Maria, José Gascó, & Juan Llopis. (2008). Razones y riesgos específicos del offshore outsourcing. RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante). 63(193). 83–110.
8.
Gonzalez, Maria, José Gascó, & Juan Llopis. (2008). Information Systems Outsourcing: an Empirical Study of Success Factors.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 11.2 indexed citations
9.
Gonzalez, Maria, et al.. (2007). E-Administración: situación actual y estudio de un caso. RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante). 101–112.
10.
Gonzalez, Maria, et al.. (2007). Observatorio Cubano de Periodismo. Acimed. 15(6). 0–0.
11.
Gonzalez, Maria, José Gascó, & Juan Llopis. (2006). El outsourcing de sistemas de Información: una revisión a la investigación. RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante). 12(3). 167–194.1 indexed citations
12.
Gonzalez, Maria, José Gascó, & Juan Llopis. (2005). La visión de los directivos de sistemas de información sobre el outsourcing. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 22(52). 29–50.
13.
Gonzalez, Maria, José Gascó, & Juan Llopis. (2004). A Study of Information Systems Outsourcing Risks. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 590–601.5 indexed citations
14.
Claver‐Cortés, Enrique, Maria Gonzalez, José Gascó, & Juan Llopis. (2003). Outsourcing informático: razones, reticencias y factores de éxito en las universidades públicas españolas. RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante). 12(4). 87–99.3 indexed citations
15.
Claver‐Cortés, Enrique, Juan Llopis, & Maria Gonzalez. (2000). El papel de la cultura informacional en la introducción de nuevos sistemas de información en la empresa. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 55(169). 139–158.
16.
Gonzalez, Maria, et al.. (1999). Estudio de la investigación en sistemas de información a través del análisis de dos revistas (1981-1997). RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante). 13(36). 97–126.4 indexed citations
17.
Claver‐Cortés, Enrique, Maria Gonzalez, & José Gascó. (1999). El outsourcing de sistemas de información de recursos humanos en España: el caso de Roche Diagnostics. RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante). 13(37). 123–145.1 indexed citations
18.
Cortés, Enrique Claver & Maria Gonzalez. (1998). Los sistemas y tecnologías de la información: su repercursión en las estructuras empresariales. Alta dirección. 32(198). 29–43.3 indexed citations
19.
Claver‐Cortés, Enrique, et al.. (1995). Sistemas expertos: un concepto cercano a la empresa. RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante). 25–31.2 indexed citations
20.
Cortés, Enrique Claver & Maria Gonzalez. (1992). Exigencias para la nueva dirección del sistema de información. 77–88.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.