Margaret Crossley
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Carl D’ArcyDebra MorganMirna VrbancicMerrill HiscockNigel S. B. RawsonVanina Dal Bello‐HaasAndrew KirkMegan E. O’Connell
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (23 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (9 papers)Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Psychiatry and Mental healthNeuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyCognitive Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Margaret Crossley
52 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Psychiatry and Mental health 704
- Cognitive Neuroscience 616
- General Health Professions 386
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 249
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 239
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Crossley
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Crossley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Crossley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Crossley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Crossley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Crossley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Crossley. The network helps show where Margaret Crossley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Crossley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Crossley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Crossley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Crossley. Margaret Crossley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 38 | |
| 7 | 75 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 41 | |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 184 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 64 |
About Margaret Crossley
Margaret Crossley is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (23 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (9 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (704 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (63 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (616 citations). Margaret Crossley has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Carl D’Arcy, Debra Morgan, Mirna Vrbancic, Merrill Hiscock, Nigel S. B. Rawson, Vanina Dal Bello‐Haas, Andrew Kirk, Megan E. O’Connell, Norma J. Stewart and Dorothy Forbes. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Health Psychology and Psychosomatic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.