Leslie Gelling

1.2k total citations
50 papers, 375 citations indexed

About

Leslie Gelling is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Leslie Gelling has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 375 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in General Health Professions, 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 6 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Leslie Gelling's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (5 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (5 papers). Leslie Gelling is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (5 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (5 papers). Leslie Gelling collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Sudan and Portugal. Leslie Gelling's co-authors include Jenny Secker, Carol Munn‐Giddings, A Toby Prevost, Jane Robinson, Catherine J. Kerr, Catherine Meads, Andrew McVicar, Joanna L. Iddon, John D. Pickard and Marek Czosnyka and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Leslie Gelling

47 papers receiving 355 citations

Peers

Leslie Gelling
Rumei Yang United States
Farida Malik United Kingdom
Elizabeth Nichols United States
Monika E. Finger Switzerland
Leslie Gelling
Citations per year, relative to Leslie Gelling Leslie Gelling (= 1×) peers Fernanda Amendola

Countries citing papers authored by Leslie Gelling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leslie Gelling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leslie Gelling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leslie Gelling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leslie Gelling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leslie Gelling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leslie Gelling. The network helps show where Leslie Gelling may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leslie Gelling

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leslie Gelling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leslie Gelling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leslie Gelling. Leslie Gelling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gelling, Leslie, et al.. (2024). Embedding Public Involvement in a PhD Research Project With People Affected by Advanced Liver Disease. Health Expectations. 27(3). e14097–e14097. 1 indexed citations
3.
Robinson, Jane & Leslie Gelling. (2019). Nurses+QI=better hospital performance? A critical review of the literature. Nursing Management. 26(4). 22–28. 14 indexed citations
4.
Gelling, Leslie. (2016). Applying for ethical approval for research: the main issues. Nursing Standard. 30(20). 40–44. 12 indexed citations
5.
Gelling, Leslie. (2015). Gaining access to the research site. Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University).
6.
Gelling, Leslie & Hilary Engward. (2015). Planning a research project. Nursing Standard. 29(28). 44–48. 2 indexed citations
7.
Gelling, Leslie. (2015). Stages in the research process. Nursing Standard. 29(27). 44–49. 16 indexed citations
8.
Gelling, Leslie. (2015). Qualitative research. Nursing Standard. 29(30). 43–47. 25 indexed citations
9.
Gelling, Leslie & María Aurora Rodríguez‐Borrego. (2014). Originality in doctoral research. Nurse Researcher. 21(6). 6–7. 1 indexed citations
10.
Gelling, Leslie. (2011). Why do I have to apply for ethical approval before I can begin my research?. PubMed. 107(30-31). 23–23. 1 indexed citations
11.
Gelling, Leslie. (2011). The complexities of using grounded theory. Nurse Researcher. 18(4). 4–5. 9 indexed citations
12.
Gelling, Leslie. (2010). Analyse the evidence. Nursing Standard. 25(8). 61–61. 2 indexed citations
13.
Smajdor, Anna, Matthew R. Sydes, Leslie Gelling, & Mick Wilkinson. (2009). Applying for ethical approval for research in the United Kingdom. BMJ. 339(oct16 1). b4013–b4013. 13 indexed citations
15.
Gelling, Leslie, Joanna L. Iddon, Andrew McVicar, & John D. Pickard. (2004). CSF circulation disorders: measuring progress in patients through quality of life and hope. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 13(5). 589–600. 15 indexed citations
16.
Gelling, Leslie, et al.. (2002). Hope in the ICU: a qualitative study exploring nurses' experiences of the concept of hope. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 7 indexed citations
17.
Gelling, Leslie. (2000). Consumer involvement in research. Nursing Standard. 15(4). 33–33. 1 indexed citations
18.
Gelling, Leslie. (1999). The role of hope for relatives of critically ill patients: a review of the literature. Nursing Standard. 14(1). 33–38. 19 indexed citations
19.
Gelling, Leslie. (1999). Ethical principles in healthcare research. Nursing Standard. 13(36). 39–42. 27 indexed citations
20.
Gelling, Leslie. (1999). Role of the research ethics committee. Nurse Education Today. 19(7). 564–569. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026