Margaret Ansell
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Clinical Psychology
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Susan BrasherJennifer ElderConsuelo KreiderGail M. KeenanTamara Gonçalves Rezende MacieiraSandra Wolfe CittyMadison B. SmithToni L. Glover
- Topics
- Library Science and Administration (4 papers)Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers)Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
Margaret Ansell
19 papers receiving 418 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Cognitive Neuroscience 149
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 108
- Clinical Psychology 103
- General Health Professions 97
- Psychiatry and Mental health 77
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Ansell
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Ansell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Ansell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Ansell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Ansell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Ansell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Ansell. The network helps show where Margaret Ansell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Ansell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Ansell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Ansell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Ansell. Margaret Ansell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 127 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 177 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | The Japanese Learner: Context, Culture and Classroom Practice | 7 |
| 19 | The good and the bad of day surgery. | 1 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Margaret Ansell
Margaret Ansell is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Health Information Management, having authored 22 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Administration (4 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers) and Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (54 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (149 citations) and Research and Theory (7 citations). Margaret Ansell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Susan Brasher, Jennifer Elder, Consuelo Kreider, Gail M. Keenan, Tamara Gonçalves Rezende Macieira, Sandra Wolfe Citty, Madison B. Smith, Toni L. Glover, Anita Stephen and Suzanne Bakken. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Academic Medicine and Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.