Malcolm Chase
- History top 2%
- Scottish History and National Identity 4
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 3
- Music top 10%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Museology top 10%
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 4
-
- Irish and British Studies 4
- Religion and Society Interactions 1
-
- Political and Economic history of UK and US 2
-
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 1
-
- Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies 1
- Journals
- The English Historical Review (2 papers)Journal of Victorian Culture (2 papers)Labour History Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Malcolm Chase
20 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- History 89
- Music 16
- Literature and Literary Theory 56
- Anthropology 37
- Museology 13
Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Chase
This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Chase's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Chase with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Chase more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Chase
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Chase. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Chase. The network helps show where Malcolm Chase may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Chase, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 27 | |
| 18 | The Imagined Past: History and Nostalgia | 1989 | 161 |
| 19 | 1989 | 28 | |
| 20 | 1967 | 89 |
About Malcolm Chase
Malcolm Chase is a scholar working on History, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Gender Studies, having authored 29 papers that have together received 411 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (4 papers), Irish and British Studies (4 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (4 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (2 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (1 paper), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (1 paper) and Religion and Society Interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (89 citations), Music (16 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (56 citations), Anthropology (37 citations) and Museology (13 citations). Malcolm Chase has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Shaw, William Rhodes, Joel H. Wiener and J. F. C. Harrison. Their work appears in journals such as The English Historical Review, Journal of Victorian Culture, Labour History Review, Past & Present and Labour History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.