Madhu Verma
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 5%
- Ecology
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Co-authors
- Stephen PolaskyFlorian V. EppinkPaul R. ArmsworthHans CornelissenRichard B. NorgaardR. David SimpsonNéstor Pérez‐MéndezLuke Brander
- Topics
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services (5 papers)Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers)Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Global and Planetary ChangeManagement, Monitoring, Policy and LawEconomics and Econometrics
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNature SustainabilityThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Madhu Verma
9 papers receiving 490 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Global and Planetary Change 377
- Economics and Econometrics 194
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 106
- Ecology 98
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 49
Countries citing papers authored by Madhu Verma
This map shows the geographic impact of Madhu Verma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Madhu Verma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Madhu Verma more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Madhu Verma
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Madhu Verma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Madhu Verma. The network helps show where Madhu Verma may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Madhu Verma
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Madhu Verma. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Madhu Verma based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Madhu Verma. Madhu Verma is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 75 | |
| 3 | 144 | |
| 4 | 35 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 207 | |
| 7 | Guidance manual for the valuation of regulating services | 15 |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | Proposed methodological framework and data issues for physical accounting of forestry resources: learning from the states of Madhya Pradesh and Himachal Pradesh | 1 |
| 10 | 1 |
About Madhu Verma
Madhu Verma is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Soil Science and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 10 papers that have together received 515 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Land Use and Ecosystem Services (5 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (377 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (106 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (194 citations). Madhu Verma has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Polasky, Florian V. Eppink, Paul R. Armsworth, Hans Cornelissen, Richard B. Norgaard, R. David Simpson, Néstor Pérez‐Méndez, Luke Brander, Hannes Palang and Erik Gómez‐Baggethun. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Sustainability and The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.