Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units
20121.8k citationsLuke Brander, Andrea Ghermandi et al.Ecosystem Servicesprofile →
Economic values for ecosystem services: A global synthesis and way forward
202461 citationsLuke Brander, Alistair McVittie et al.Ecosystem Servicesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Brander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Brander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Brander more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Brander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Brander. The network helps show where Luke Brander may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke Brander
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke Brander.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke Brander based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Luke Brander. Luke Brander is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gentner, Brad, Ulf Gräwe, René Friedland, et al.. (2016). The value of billfish resources to both commercial and recreational sectors in the Caribbean. Ecological Indicators. 73(1).3 indexed citations
Kuik, O.J., et al.. (2008). Energy-related external costs due to land use changes, acidification and eutrophication, visual intrusion and climate change. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).6 indexed citations
Brander, Luke, P.J.H. van Beukering, & H.S.J. Cesar. (2006). The recreational value of coral reefs: A meta-analysis. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.2 indexed citations
15.
Bartelings, Heleen, P.J.H. van Beukering, O.J. Kuik, et al.. (2005). Effectiveness of landfill taxation. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam).27 indexed citations
16.
Brander, Luke, Raymond J.G.M. Florax, & Jan E. Vermaat. (2003). The empirics of wetland valuation: A comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam).1 indexed citations
17.
Brander, Luke & A.A. Olsthoorn. (2002). Three scenarios for green public procurement. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam).3 indexed citations
18.
Dorland, C., et al.. (2001). Netherlands Climate Change Studies Assistance Programme: Report of the NCCSAP Workshop, 27-28 November 2000, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).1 indexed citations
19.
Cesar, H.S.J., C. Dorland, A.A. Olsthoorn, et al.. (2000). Economic valuation of improvement of air quality in the metropolitan area of Mexico City. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).3 indexed citations
20.
Brander, Luke. (2000). Costing CDM projects: practical illustrations. VU Research Portal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.