Nature Sustainability

1.3k papers and 76.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Nature Sustainability in the last decades have received a total of 76.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Nature Sustainability usually cover Global and Planetary Change (341 papers), Ecology (173 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (139 papers) specifically the topics of Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (108 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (85 papers) and Energy and Environment Impacts (70 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Sustainability are Jasper van Vliet, Jay Whitacre, Rebecca E. Ciez, Daniel W. O’Neill, Andrew L. Fanning, Johan Rockström, Lucas Chancel, William F. Lamb, J. Steinberger and Philippe Ciais.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nature Sustainability

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Sustainability. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Sustainability.

Countries where authors publish in Nature Sustainability

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Sustainability. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Sustainability with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Sustainability more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025