Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Changes in the global value of ecosystem services
20144.1k citationsRobert Costanza, R.S. de Groot et al.Global Environmental Changeprofile →
Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making
20082.2k citationsBrendan Fisher, R. Kerry Turner et al.profile →
Economic Reasons for Conserving Wild Nature
20021.0k citationsAndrew Balmford, Robert Costanza et al.profile →
Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions
2003546 citationsR. Kerry Turner, Stephen Färber et al.profile →
Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy
2000506 citationsR. Kerry Turner, Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh et al.profile →
Prospective tourist preferences for sustainable tourism development in Small Island Developing States
2020201 citationsTiziana Luisetti, Silvia Ferrini et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by R. Kerry Turner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Kerry Turner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Kerry Turner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Kerry Turner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Kerry Turner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Kerry Turner. The network helps show where R. Kerry Turner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Kerry Turner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Kerry Turner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Kerry Turner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Kerry Turner. R. Kerry Turner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Costanza, Robert, R.S. de Groot, Paul C. Sutton, et al.. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change. 26. 152–158.4103 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Fisher, Brendan, Ian J. Bateman, & R. Kerry Turner. (2013). Valuing ecosystem services: benefits, values, space and time. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA). 58–69.
7.
Luisetti, Tiziana, R. Kerry Turner, David Hadley, & Sian Morse‐Jones. (2010). Coastal and marine ecosystem services valuation for policy and management. Econstor (Econstor).9 indexed citations
Turner, R. Kerry, Stavros Georgiou, Rebecca Clark, Roy Brouwer, & Jacob J. Burke. (2004). Economic Valuation of Water Resources. UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia).2 indexed citations
11.
Langford, Ian H., R. Kerry Turner, Stavros Georgiou, & Ian J. Bateman. (2004). Environmental decision making and risk management : selected essays. E. Elgar eBooks.1 indexed citations
Turner, R. Kerry, Kenneth Button, & Peter Nijkamp. (1999). Ecosystems and nature : economics, science and policy. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.