Mabel Crescioni
- Epidemiology
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- J. Daniel TwelkerSonya EremencoG. Lynn MitchellErin M. HarveyJoseph M. MillerBill ByromPaul O’DonohoeShima Safikhani
- Topics
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers)Corneal surgery and disorders (5 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomBrazil
In The Last Decade
Mabel Crescioni
19 papers receiving 273 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Epidemiology 108
- Ophthalmology 65
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 63
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 43
- General Health Professions 42
Countries citing papers authored by Mabel Crescioni
This map shows the geographic impact of Mabel Crescioni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mabel Crescioni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mabel Crescioni more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mabel Crescioni
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mabel Crescioni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mabel Crescioni. The network helps show where Mabel Crescioni may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mabel Crescioni
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mabel Crescioni. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mabel Crescioni based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mabel Crescioni. Mabel Crescioni is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 45 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 53 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 46 | |
| 19 | Trends in health status and health care use among older men. | 17 |
About Mabel Crescioni
Mabel Crescioni is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Ophthalmology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 19 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (5 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (65 citations), Epidemiology (108 citations) and Applied Psychology (15 citations). Mabel Crescioni has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include J. Daniel Twelker, Sonya Eremenco, G. Lynn Mitchell, Erin M. Harvey, Joseph M. Miller, Bill Byrom, Paul O’Donohoe, Shima Safikhani, Margaret Vernon and Katharine S. Gries. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Optometry and Vision Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.