This map shows the geographic impact of David Abrams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Abrams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Abrams more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Abrams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Abrams. The network helps show where David Abrams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Abrams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Abrams.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Abrams based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Abrams. David Abrams is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Abrams, David, et al.. (2009). A prospective study of weight gain during the college freshman and sophomore years. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 48(3).7 indexed citations
Abrams, David. (1999). Duke-Elder's Practice of Refraction Tenth Edition.1 indexed citations
9.
Abrams, David, et al.. (1997). Health behavior and health education: The past, present, and future. 453–478.16 indexed citations
10.
Abrams, David, et al.. (1992). Commentary on stages of change and decisional balance for twelve problem behaviors.. Diabetes Spectrum. 6(1). 38–40.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.