M. Stokes

421 citations
26 papers · 264 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

M. Stokes

23 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

M. Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 71
  • Emergency Medical Services 49
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 33
  • Developmental Neuroscience 15
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 34
Replace William H. Chamberlin with:
William H. Chamberlin United States
Julia Sobol United States
Henk W. van Hamersvelt Netherlands
Marie Bruyère France
Julie Contenti France
Lewis Steinberg United States
Biljana Drašković Serbia
Janusz Andres Poland
Rajeev Chauhan India
Z. Williams Australia
M. Stokes relative to William H. Chamberlin United States William H. Chamberlin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
William H. Chamberlin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Stokes. The network helps show where M. Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Stokes Line = papers co-authored together M. Stokes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200031
2 201928
3 199625
4 200725
5 200624
6 201822
7 201321
8 199818
9 199811
10 202310
11 199510
12 19998
13 20006
14 19965
15 19914
16 19913
17 20033
18 20003
19 19952
20 20241

About M. Stokes

M. Stokes is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medical Services and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (3 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers) and Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (71 citations), Emergency Medical Services (49 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (33 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (15 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (34 citations). M. Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include G. H. Tovey, Adrian Drake‐Lee, D. Jerwood, Oliver Bagshaw, Paul A. Townsend, Carl B. Paulino, Desmond Curran, Robert Pivec, Michael L. Ganz and Lijoy Varghese. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia, Pediatric Anesthesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia, European Journal of Anaesthesiology and Journal of Nephrology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026