Pediatric Anesthesia

4.5k papers and 77.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.5k papers published in Pediatric Anesthesia in the last decades have received a total of 77.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Pediatric Anesthesia usually cover Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (2.1k papers), Surgery (1.8k papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (1.2k papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (1.1k papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (879 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pediatric Anesthesia are Brian J. Anderson, Joseph D. Tobias, N S Morton, Markus Weiß, Andrew Davidson, Adrian Bösenberg, Britta S. von Ungern‐Sternberg, I. Murat, Bray and Isabelle Constant.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pediatric Anesthesia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pediatric Anesthesia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pediatric Anesthesia.

Countries where authors publish in Pediatric Anesthesia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pediatric Anesthesia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pediatric Anesthesia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pediatric Anesthesia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025