M. E. Pina
Impact in
- Pharmaceutical Science top 0.5%
- Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
- Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
- Analytical Chemistry top 2%
- Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Papers in
-
- Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems 18
- Advanced Drug Delivery Systems 11
- Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery 4
-
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity 3
- Co-authors
- Francisco Veiga (17 shared papers)João Sousa (15 shared papers)M.L. Vueba (9 shared papers)Luís A. E. Batista de Carvalho (9 shared papers)M. Menéndez (2 shared papers)Maria Teresa Batista (3 shared papers)Jesús Miguel Santamaría (1 shared paper)Fridrun Podczeck (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
M. E. Pina
39 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Pharmaceutical Science 587
- Analytical Chemistry 185
- Molecular Medicine 67
- Biomaterials 132
- Food Science 168
Countries citing papers authored by M. E. Pina
This map shows the geographic impact of M. E. Pina's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. E. Pina with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. E. Pina more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. E. Pina
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. E. Pina. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. E. Pina. The network helps show where M. E. Pina may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. E. Pina, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 137 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 108 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 96 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 77 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 58 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 57 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 53 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 43 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 41 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 35 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 29 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 25 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 18 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1996 | 16 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 15 |
About M. E. Pina
M. E. Pina is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Food Science, Analytical Chemistry, Biomaterials and Spectroscopy, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (18 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (11 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (8 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (5 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (4 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (3 papers) and Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (587 citations), Analytical Chemistry (185 citations), Molecular Medicine (67 citations), Biomaterials (132 citations) and Food Science (168 citations). M. E. Pina has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Spain and Angola. Frequent co-authors include Francisco Veiga, João Sousa, M.L. Vueba, Luís A. E. Batista de Carvalho, M. Menéndez, Maria Teresa Batista, Jesús Miguel Santamaría, Fridrun Podczeck, J.J.C. Teixeira‐Dias and Artur Figueirinha. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Pharmaceutical Development and Technology, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Journal of Membrane Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.