Mark E. Peecher

3.6k total citations
71 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Mark E. Peecher is a scholar working on Accounting, General Decision Sciences and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark E. Peecher has authored 71 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 56 papers in Accounting, 19 papers in General Decision Sciences and 17 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Mark E. Peecher's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (56 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (19 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (11 papers). Mark E. Peecher is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (56 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (19 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (11 papers). Mark E. Peecher collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Mark E. Peecher's co-authors include Ira Solomon, Kathryn Kadous, William Elliott, Sheela Kennedy, M. David Piercey, Ken T. Trotman, Jane Kennedy, Brian J. White, Kevin Jackson and Rachel Schwartz and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Accounting Research, The Accounting Review and Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

In The Last Decade

Mark E. Peecher

68 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Mark E. Peecher 2.1k 649 532 491 477 71 2.7k
Kathryn Kadous 2.4k 1.1× 485 0.7× 708 1.3× 589 1.2× 681 1.4× 75 3.3k
Ira Solomon 1.9k 0.9× 504 0.8× 398 0.7× 460 0.9× 272 0.6× 45 2.4k
Jacqueline S. Hammersley 1.6k 0.8× 404 0.6× 281 0.5× 329 0.7× 283 0.6× 26 2.0k
Hun‐Tong Tan 3.6k 1.7× 1.0k 1.6× 567 1.1× 834 1.7× 529 1.1× 115 4.3k
Michael Gibbins 2.0k 1.0× 616 0.9× 292 0.5× 778 1.6× 322 0.7× 41 2.5k
Steven J. Kachelmeier 1.2k 0.6× 319 0.5× 523 1.0× 363 0.7× 714 1.5× 59 2.1k
Bryan K. Church 1.4k 0.7× 367 0.6× 320 0.6× 309 0.6× 401 0.8× 86 2.2k
Steven M. Glover 2.0k 0.9× 558 0.9× 217 0.4× 491 1.0× 189 0.4× 67 2.4k
Arnold M. Wright 2.2k 1.0× 603 0.9× 180 0.3× 708 1.4× 219 0.5× 55 2.6k
Jane Kennedy 1.4k 0.7× 340 0.5× 394 0.7× 503 1.0× 253 0.5× 14 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Peecher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Peecher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Peecher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Peecher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Peecher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Peecher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Peecher. The network helps show where Mark E. Peecher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark E. Peecher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark E. Peecher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark E. Peecher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark E. Peecher. Mark E. Peecher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Maksymov, Eldar, et al.. (2023). How Trial Preparation Factors Influence Audit Litigation Outcomes: Insights from Audit Litigators. The Accounting Review. 99(3). 373–396. 2 indexed citations
2.
Peecher, Mark E., et al.. (2023). Promoting proactive auditing behaviors. Contemporary Accounting Research. 41(1). 620–644.
3.
Maksymov, Eldar, Mark E. Peecher, Andrew Sutherland, & Joseph Weber. (2023). Audit Partners’ Role in Material Misstatement Resolution: Survey and Interview Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research. 62(1). 275–333. 14 indexed citations
4.
Hayne, Christie, et al.. (2023). Managing Quality Control Systems: How Audit Firms Experience and Navigate Conflicting Institutional Demands. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
6.
Maksymov, Eldar, Mark E. Peecher, Andrew Sutherland, & Joseph Weber. (2023). Audit Partners’ Role in Material Misstatement Resolution: Survey and Interview Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal. 7 indexed citations
7.
Peecher, Mark E., et al.. (2021). Do Stronger Wise-Thinking Dispositions Facilitate Auditors’ Objective Evaluation of Evidence When Assessing and Addressing Fraud Risk?. 1 indexed citations
8.
Lowe, D. Jordan, et al.. (2020). Factors Affecting the Outcomes of Legal Claims against Auditors. Current Issues in Auditing. 15(2). P10–P16.
9.
Peecher, Mark E., et al.. (2020). Promoting Proactive Auditing Behaviors. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
10.
Maksymov, Eldar, Jeffrey S. Pickerd, D. Jordan Lowe, et al.. (2019). The Settlement Norm in Audit Legal Disputes: Insights from Prominent Attorneys. Contemporary Accounting Research. 37(3). 1400–1443. 40 indexed citations
11.
Brown, Tim, et al.. (2018). An Auditor Judgment Rule and Juror Learning: Theory-Based Interventions to Reduce Outcome Effects in Juror Evaluations of Auditor Negligence. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
12.
Bol, Jasmijn C., Cassandra Estep, Frank Moers, & Mark E. Peecher. (2018). The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Auditor Expertise and Human Capital Development. Journal of Accounting Research. 56(4). 1205–1252. 62 indexed citations
13.
Brown, Tim, et al.. (2016). The Impact of a Higher Intent Standard on Auditors' Legal Exposure and the Moderating Role of Jurors' Legal Knowledge. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations
14.
Brown, Tim, et al.. (2014). The Impact of a Judgment Rule and Critical Audit Matters on Assessments of Auditor Legal Liability – The Moderating Role of Legal Knowledge. SSRN Electronic Journal. 9 indexed citations
15.
Elliott, William, Susan D. Krische, & Mark E. Peecher. (2010). Expected Mispricing: The Joint Influence of Accounting Transparency and Investor Base. Journal of Accounting Research. 48(2). 343–381. 53 indexed citations
16.
Peecher, Mark E. & M. David Piercey. (2006). Judging Audit Quality in Light of Adverse Outcomes: Evidence of Outcome Bias and Reverse Outcome Bias. SSRN Electronic Journal. 29 indexed citations
17.
Kadous, Kathryn, Sheela Kennedy, & Mark E. Peecher. (2003). The Effect of Quality Assessment and Directional Goal Commitment on Auditors' Acceptance of Client-Preferred Accounting Methods. The Accounting Review. 78(3). 759–778. 312 indexed citations
18.
Peecher, Mark E.. (2002). A Discussion of “Audit Review: Managers' Interpersonal Expectations and Conduct of the Review”. Contemporary Accounting Research. 19(3). 445–448. 6 indexed citations
19.
Kennedy, Jane, Don N. Kleinmuntz, & Mark E. Peecher. (1997). Determinants of the Justifiability of Performance in Ill-Structured Audit Tasks. Journal of Accounting Research. 35. 105–105. 97 indexed citations
20.
Peecher, Mark E.. (1994). Consequentiality, justification and auditors' decision processes : a theoretical framework and two experiments. University Microfilms International eBooks. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026