M. A. Troxel
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Computational Mechanics
- Co-authors
- Mustapha IshakXiao FangJ. BlazekN. MacCrannAustin PeelE. BaronDavid BranchDavid J. Jeffery
- Topics
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (19 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (14 papers)Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (11 papers)
- Journals
- Physical Review LettersMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
M. A. Troxel
27 papers receiving 467 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 454
- Instrumentation 125
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 102
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 53
- Computational Mechanics 19
Countries citing papers authored by M. A. Troxel
This map shows the geographic impact of M. A. Troxel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. A. Troxel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. A. Troxel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. A. Troxel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. A. Troxel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. A. Troxel. The network helps show where M. A. Troxel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. A. Troxel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. A. Troxel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. A. Troxel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. A. Troxel. M. A. Troxel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 106 | |
| 11 | Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing | 2 |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | Weak lensing in the Dark Energy Survey | 0 |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About M. A. Troxel
M. A. Troxel is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (19 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (14 papers) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (125 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (454 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (102 citations). M. A. Troxel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Mustapha Ishak, Xiao Fang, J. Blazek, N. MacCrann, Austin Peel, E. Baron, David Branch, David J. Jeffery, J. Parrent and Nicholas R. Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.