Austin Peel

881 total citations
20 papers, 316 citations indexed

About

Austin Peel is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Austin Peel has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 316 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 5 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in Austin Peel's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (14 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (10 papers) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (5 papers). Austin Peel is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (14 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (10 papers) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (5 papers). Austin Peel collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Switzerland. Austin Peel's co-authors include Mustapha Ishak, M. A. Troxel, Jean‐Luc Starck, V. Pettorino, C. Giocoli, M. Meneghetti, Julian Merten, Marco Baldi, François Lanusse and Jia Liu and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

Austin Peel

20 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Austin Peel

NHEP

INSTR

AMPO

Digvijay Wadekar United States

A. N. Taylor United Kingdom

Xiangkun Liu China

S. T. Balan United Kingdom

É. Aubourg France

P. G. Castro United Kingdom

Giulio Fabbian United Kingdom

Henrique S. Xavier Brazil

J. Benjamin Germany

Cristiano G. Sabiu South Korea

Digvijay Wadekar United States

Austin Peel

261 ×0.9

133 ×1.4

NHEP

36 ×0.8

INSTR

35 ×1.2

21 ×0.8

AMPO

Citations per year, relative to Austin Peel Austin Peel (= 1×) peers Digvijay Wadekar

Countries citing papers authored by Austin Peel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Austin Peel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Austin Peel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Austin Peel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Austin Peel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Austin Peel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Austin Peel. The network helps show where Austin Peel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Austin Peel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Austin Peel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Austin Peel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Austin Peel. Austin Peel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Vernardos, G., Dominique Sluse, D. Pooley, et al.. (2024). Microlensing of Strongly Lensed Quasars. Space Science Reviews. 220(1). 17 indexed citations

Vernardos, G., et al.. (2023). Modeling lens potentials with continuous neural fields in galaxy-scale strong lenses. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 675. A125–A125. 5 indexed citations

Campagne, J.E., François Lanusse, J. Zuntz, et al.. (2023). JAX-COSMO: An End-to-End Differentiable and GPU Accelerated Cosmology Library. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6. 36 indexed citations

Farrens, S., M. Kilbinger, T.I Liaudat, et al.. (2022). ShapePipe: A modular weak-lensing processing and analysis pipeline. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 664. A141–A141. 5 indexed citations

Kilbinger, M., S. Farrens, Austin Peel, et al.. (2022). ShapePipe: A new shape measurement pipeline and weak-lensing application to UNIONS/CFIS data. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 666. A162–A162. 11 indexed citations

Tolley, E., A. Galan, Austin Peel, et al.. (2022). Lightweight HI source finding for next generation radio surveys. Astronomy and Computing. 41. 100631–100631. 2 indexed citations

Starck, Jean‐Luc, et al.. (2021). Weak-lensing mass reconstruction using sparsity and a Gaussian random field. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 12 indexed citations

Tihhonova, O., F. Courbin, David Harvey, et al.. (2020). H0LiCOW – XI. A weak lensing measurement of the external convergence in the field of the lensed quasar B1608+656 using HST and Subaru deep imaging. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 498(1). 1406–1419. 11 indexed citations

Ajani, Virginia, Austin Peel, V. Pettorino, et al.. (2020). Constraining neutrino masses with weak-lensing multiscale peak counts. Physical review. D. 102(10). 31 indexed citations

10.

Peel, Austin, et al.. (2019). The impact of baryonic physics and massive neutrinos on weak lensing peak statistics. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 488(3). 3340–3357. 17 indexed citations

11.

Merten, Julian, C. Giocoli, Marco Baldi, et al.. (2019). On the dissection of degenerate cosmologies with machine learning. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 487(1). 104–122. 26 indexed citations

12.

Peel, Austin, Jean‐Luc Starck, V. Pettorino, et al.. (2019). Distinguishing standard and modified gravity cosmologies with machine learning. Physical review. D. 100(2). 39 indexed citations

13.

Peel, Austin, Chieh-An Lin, François Lanusse, et al.. (2016). Cosmological constraints with weak lensing peak counts and second-order statistics in a large-field survey. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 229. 1 indexed citations

14.

Peel, Austin, M. A. Troxel, & Mustapha Ishak. (2014). Effect of inhomogeneities on high precision measurements of cosmological distances. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 90(12). 17 indexed citations

15.

Troxel, M. A., Mustapha Ishak, & Austin Peel. (2014). The effects of structure anisotropy on lensing observables in an exact general relativistic setting for precision cosmology. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2014(3). 40–40. 10 indexed citations

16.

Ishak, Mustapha, Austin Peel, & M. A. Troxel. (2013). Stringent Restriction from the Growth of Large-Scale Structure on Apparent Acceleration in Inhomogeneous Cosmological Models. Physical Review Letters. 111(25). 251302–251302. 15 indexed citations

17.

Troxel, M. A., Austin Peel, & Mustapha Ishak. (2013). Effects of anisotropy on gravitational infall in galaxy clusters using an exact general relativistic model. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2013(12). 48–48. 8 indexed citations

18.

Peel, Austin & Mustapha Ishak. (2012). Growth of Structure in the Szekeres Inhomogeneous Cosmological Models and the Matter-Dominated Era. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 3 indexed citations

19.

Ishak, Mustapha & Austin Peel. (2012). Growth of structure in the Szekeres class-II inhomogeneous cosmological models and the matter-dominated era. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 85(8). 28 indexed citations

20.

Peel, Austin, Mustapha Ishak, & M. A. Troxel. (2012). Large-scale growth evolution in the Szekeres inhomogeneous cosmological models with comparison to growth data. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 86(12). 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact