L.W. Murray

58 papers receiving 733 citations

Peers

L.W. Murray
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Equine 36
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 212
  • Animal Science and Zoology 128
  • Small Animals 78
  • Plant Science 300
Replace J.L. Stewart with:
J.L. Stewart United States
Charles T. Dougherty United States
Douglas R. Tolleson United States
B.E. Brent United States
G.P. Cosgrove New Zealand
G. Scaglia United States
J. W. Waggoner United States
S.O. Hoskin New Zealand
Bok F. Sowell United States
M. J. Williams United States
L.W. Murray relative to J.L. Stewart United States J.L. Stewart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
J.L. Stewart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L.W. Murray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L.W. Murray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L.W. Murray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L.W. Murray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L.W. Murray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L.W. Murray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L.W. Murray. The network helps show where L.W. Murray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside L.W. Murray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L.W. Murray Line = papers co-authored together L.W. Murray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201260
2 200445
3 200943
4 199143
5 200842
6 199940
7 201132
8 200427
9 200425
10 201124
11 199223
12 200721
13 199220
14 201220
15 201019
16 197919
17 199618
18 199417
19 198716
20 199613

About L.W. Murray

L.W. Murray is a scholar working on Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, Small Animals and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 787 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (12 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (9 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (7 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (5 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (5 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (4 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (4 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (36 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (212 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (128 citations), Small Animals (78 citations) and Plant Science (300 citations). L.W. Murray has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include I. M. Ray, Charlotte McCarthy, Kris M. Havstad, D.M. Anderson, Robert M. Aiken, Brian Olson, Daniel M. O’Brien, Joshua N. Smith, C. V. Hulet and Ed L. Fredrickson. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Meat Science, Journal of Animal Science, Crop Science and Journal of Equine Veterinary Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact