B.E. Brent

1.5k total citations
38 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

B.E. Brent is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Animal Science and Zoology. According to data from OpenAlex, B.E. Brent has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 10 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 7 papers in Animal Science and Zoology. Recurrent topics in B.E. Brent's work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (23 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (5 papers) and Plant and fungal interactions (5 papers). B.E. Brent is often cited by papers focused on Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (23 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (5 papers) and Plant and fungal interactions (5 papers). B.E. Brent collaborates with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Israel. B.E. Brent's co-authors include K. Bolsen, C. D. Lin, William R. Aimutis, A. M. Feyerherm, E.E. Bartley, Daniel Y.C. Fung, J. Urban, D. E. Ullrey, J.T. Dickerson and E.F. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Nutrition, Journal of Dairy Science and Journal of Animal Science.

In The Last Decade

B.E. Brent

31 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
B.E. Brent United States 17 852 297 192 168 162 38 1.2k
P. Thivend France 16 979 1.1× 377 1.3× 85 0.4× 182 1.1× 350 2.2× 55 1.5k
K. R. Pond United States 25 1.1k 1.3× 367 1.2× 113 0.6× 177 1.1× 436 2.7× 63 1.6k
H. E. Amos United States 22 1.0k 1.2× 317 1.1× 68 0.4× 257 1.5× 343 2.1× 77 1.4k
J. C. Meiske United States 22 1.1k 1.2× 545 1.8× 79 0.4× 103 0.6× 385 2.4× 67 1.6k
W. A. Dewar Italy 16 544 0.6× 539 1.8× 83 0.4× 186 1.1× 182 1.1× 46 1.2k
F. M. C. Gilchrist South Africa 12 656 0.8× 147 0.5× 61 0.3× 94 0.6× 213 1.3× 21 964
J. van Bruchem Netherlands 21 918 1.1× 315 1.1× 68 0.4× 140 0.8× 356 2.2× 73 1.2k
H. Tagari Israel 25 1.4k 1.7× 503 1.7× 117 0.6× 195 1.2× 595 3.7× 63 1.8k
DB Purser United States 20 933 1.1× 271 0.9× 43 0.2× 202 1.2× 318 2.0× 56 1.2k
U. Krishnamoorthy India 15 1.3k 1.5× 297 1.0× 78 0.4× 300 1.8× 361 2.2× 43 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by B.E. Brent

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B.E. Brent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B.E. Brent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B.E. Brent more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B.E. Brent

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B.E. Brent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B.E. Brent. The network helps show where B.E. Brent may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of B.E. Brent

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B.E. Brent. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B.E. Brent based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B.E. Brent. B.E. Brent is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bolsen, K., et al.. (2002). A study of the chemical and microbial changes in whole-plant corn silage during exposure to air: effects of a biological additive and sealing technique. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports. 151–153. 4 indexed citations
2.
Bolsen, K., et al.. (2002). A study of the chemical and microbial changes in whole-plant corn silage during fermentation and storage: effects of packing density and sealing technique. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports. 148–150. 2 indexed citations
3.
Whitlock, L.A., et al.. (2000). Effect of level of surface-spoiled silage on the nutritive value of corn silage-based rations. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports. 22–24. 15 indexed citations
4.
Turner, James, et al.. (1997). Economics of sealing horizontal silos. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports. 84–86. 1 indexed citations
5.
Brent, B.E., et al.. (1995). Losses from top spoilage in horizontal silos. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports. 59–62. 1 indexed citations
6.
Lin, C. D., K. Bolsen, B.E. Brent, et al.. (1992). Epiphytic Microflora on Alfalfa and Whole-Plant Corn. Journal of Dairy Science. 75(9). 2484–2493. 86 indexed citations
7.
Brent, B.E., et al.. (1992). Epiphytic lactic acid bacteria succession during the pre-ensiling and ensiling periods of alfalfa and corn. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports. 113–119.
8.
Bolsen, K., et al.. (1992). Effects of Biomate® inoculant and dextrose on the fermentation of alfalfa silages. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports. 120–125. 1 indexed citations
9.
Dickerson, J.T., et al.. (1992). Losses from top spoilage in horizontal silos in western Kansas. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports. 129–132. 1 indexed citations
10.
Bolsen, K., et al.. (1992). Epiphytic lactic acid bacteria succession during the pre‐ensiling and ensiling periods of alfalfa and maize. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 73(5). 375–387. 137 indexed citations
11.
Dickerson, J.T., et al.. (1991). Rate and extent of top spoilage losses of alfalfa silage stored in horizontal silos. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports. 75–78. 2 indexed citations
12.
Dickerson, J.T., et al.. (1991). Top spoilage losses in horizontal silos in western Kansas. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports. 71–74. 3 indexed citations
13.
Robel, Robert J., et al.. (1986). BLOOD CHARACTERISTICS OF WHITE-TAILED DEER FROM NORTHEASTERN KANSAS. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 22(3). 385–388. 13 indexed citations
14.
Nagaraja, T. G., et al.. (1979). Characterization of Endotoxin from the Rumen Bacterium Megasphaera elsdenii. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 40(1). 35–39. 8 indexed citations
15.
Brent, B.E., et al.. (1978). Predicting cattle performance from mathematical models. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports. 90–93. 1 indexed citations
16.
Brent, B.E.. (1976). Relationship of Acidosis to Other Feedlot Ailments. Journal of Animal Science. 43(4). 930–935. 92 indexed citations
17.
Brent, B.E., et al.. (1971). Effect of adding fat to feedlot rations. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports. 15–18. 1 indexed citations
18.
Brent, B.E., et al.. (1970). Mineral content of feeds grown at various Kansas locations. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports. 5–11. 1 indexed citations
19.
Ullrey, D. E., William Youatt, Heather E. Johnson, et al.. (1968). Digestibility of Cedar and Balsam Fir Browse for the White-Tailed Deer. Journal of Wildlife Management. 32(1). 162–162. 48 indexed citations
20.
Kornegay, E. T., E. R. Miller, B.E. Brent, et al.. (1964). Effect of Fasting and Refeeding on Body Weight, Rectal Temperature, Blood Volume and Various Blood Constituents in Growing Swine. Journal of Nutrition. 84(3). 295–304. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026