Applied Animal Behaviour Science

6.1k papers and 180.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.1k papers published in Applied Animal Behaviour Science in the last decades have received a total of 180.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Animal Behaviour Science usually cover Small Animals (4.2k papers), Animal Science and Zoology (2.5k papers) and Genetics (2.4k papers) specifically the topics of Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4.1k papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (1.7k papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (1.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Animal Behaviour Science are P.H. Hemsworth, Per Jensen, Christine J Nicol, Ruth C. Newberry, Caroline J Hewson, J. Rushen, Daniel M. Weary, David Fraser, Michael Mendl and Margit Bak Jensen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Animal Behaviour Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Animal Behaviour Science.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Animal Behaviour Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Animal Behaviour Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Animal Behaviour Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025