Thomas Münster
Impact in
- Plant Science top 1%
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in
-
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 15
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 3
-
- Plant and animal studies 2
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 2
- Bryophyte Studies and Records 2
- Co-authors
- Heinz SaedlerGünter TheißenJan T. KimAnnette BeckerKai‐Uwe WinterAkira KannoWim VerelstMitsuyasu Hasebe
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (4 papers)Gene (3 papers)Molecular Biology and Evolution (2 papers)Plant Biology (2 papers)PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyJapanNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Thomas Münster
18 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Plant Science 2.0k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 552
- Horticulture 27
- Molecular Biology 1.9k
- Genetics 116
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Münster
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Münster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Münster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Münster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Münster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Münster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Münster. The network helps show where Thomas Münster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Münster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 39 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 94 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 90 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 99 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 99 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 47 | |
| 10 | Maize MADS-Box Genes Galore | 2002 | 57 |
| 11 | 2002 | 218 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 100 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 40 | |
| 15 | A short history of MADS-box genes in plants. | 2000 | 284 |
| 16 | A short history of MADS-box genes in plants Hit paper breakdown → | 2000 | 540 |
| 17 | 1999 | 259 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 211 |
About Thomas Münster
Thomas Münster is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 18 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Molecular Biology Research (15 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (9 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (5 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (2 papers), Bryophyte Studies and Records (2 papers) and Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (2.0k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (552 citations), Horticulture (27 citations), Molecular Biology (1.9k citations) and Genetics (116 citations). Thomas Münster has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Heinz Saedler, Günter Theißen, Jan T. Kim, Annette Becker, Kai‐Uwe Winter, Akira Kanno, Wim Verelst, Mitsuyasu Hasebe, Rumiko Kofuji and Jens Pahnke. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Gene, Molecular Biology and Evolution, Plant Biology and PLANT PHYSIOLOGY.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.