Luke Williams

945 citations
4 papers · 503 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Luke Williams

4 papers receiving 472 citations

Peers

Luke Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 272
  • Clinical Psychology 170
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 157
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 78
  • Social Psychology 114
Replace Maximilian B. Bibok with:
Maximilian B. Bibok Canada
Nancie Im‐Bolter Canada
Carin Marciszko Sweden
Josef Perner Austria
Lizet Ketelaar Netherlands
Christian Klicpera Austria
Marie‐Anne Schelstraete Belgium
Peter de Villiers United States
Jacquelyn M. Briesch United States
Katharine Suma United States
Luke Williams relative to Maximilian B. Bibok Canada Maximilian B. Bibok's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Maximilian B. Bibok · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luke Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Williams. The network helps show where Luke Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Luke Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luke Williams Line = papers co-authored together Luke Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

4 of 4 papers shown
#Work
1 2004488
2
Data acquisition, data storage, and data presentation in a modern genetics laboratory.
200011
3 20223
4 20231

About Luke Williams

Luke Williams is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Genetics, having authored 4 papers that have together received 503 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Rare Diseases (1 paper), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (1 paper), Higher Education Learning Practices (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (1 paper), Competency Development and Evaluation (1 paper), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (1 paper) and Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (272 citations), Clinical Psychology (170 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (157 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (78 citations) and Social Psychology (114 citations). Luke Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stephanie M. Carlson, Dorothy J. Mandell, Hiep‐Hung Pham, Melita Irving, Brandon L. Guthrie, B. Nelson, Dan Geraghty, Riza M. Daza, Quyen Vu and Leonela Carabajal Paladino. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, Developmental Psychology and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact