Adam C. Schaffer

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
23 papers, 959 citations indexed

About

Adam C. Schaffer is a scholar working on Pharmacy, General Health Professions and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Adam C. Schaffer has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 959 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Pharmacy, 10 papers in General Health Professions and 7 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Adam C. Schaffer's work include Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (15 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (8 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (7 papers). Adam C. Schaffer is often cited by papers focused on Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (15 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (8 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (7 papers). Adam C. Schaffer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Israel and Italy. Adam C. Schaffer's co-authors include Jean C. Lee, C. Winnie Yu‐Moe, Edwin A. Locke, Ken G. Smith, Dong-Ok Chah, Miriam Erez, Dana Siegal, Allen Kachalia, Zheyu Wang and Yuxin Zhu and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Management and Radiology.

In The Last Decade

Adam C. Schaffer

22 papers receiving 905 citations

Hit Papers

Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA 2023 2026 2024 2025 2023 25 50 75

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Adam C. Schaffer United States 11 252 209 194 182 176 23 959
Megha Shah United States 18 36 0.1× 285 1.4× 48 0.2× 497 2.7× 19 0.1× 62 1.5k
David White United Kingdom 18 203 0.8× 122 0.6× 34 0.2× 188 1.0× 25 0.1× 43 1.4k
Sara Kim United States 19 220 0.9× 168 0.8× 15 0.1× 139 0.8× 56 0.3× 68 1.3k
Valdes Roberto Bóllela Brazil 20 435 1.7× 109 0.5× 14 0.1× 214 1.2× 333 1.9× 136 1.7k
Megan McLaughlin United States 21 497 2.0× 209 1.0× 37 0.2× 147 0.8× 8 0.0× 83 1.4k
Ross D. Silverman United States 18 136 0.5× 34 0.2× 51 0.3× 321 1.8× 12 0.1× 64 1.2k
N. K. Arora India 13 158 0.6× 22 0.1× 15 0.1× 202 1.1× 87 0.5× 42 920
Simone Gibson Australia 16 172 0.7× 14 0.1× 93 0.5× 352 1.9× 16 0.1× 60 1.4k
Yasmin Khaliq Canada 13 315 1.3× 98 0.5× 16 0.1× 291 1.6× 8 0.0× 15 1.6k
Jack Resneck United States 20 154 0.6× 43 0.2× 34 0.2× 280 1.5× 17 0.1× 38 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Adam C. Schaffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam C. Schaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam C. Schaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam C. Schaffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam C. Schaffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam C. Schaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam C. Schaffer. The network helps show where Adam C. Schaffer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam C. Schaffer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam C. Schaffer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam C. Schaffer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam C. Schaffer. Adam C. Schaffer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schaffer, Adam C., et al.. (2024). Assessment of Claimant, Clinical, and Financial Characteristics of Teleradiology Medical Malpractice Cases. Radiology. 311(1). e232806–e232806. 1 indexed citations
2.
Folcarelli, Patricia, et al.. (2024). Examining Nursing Medical Malpractice Cases Related to Medications. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 54(11). 631–637.
3.
Schaffer, Adam C., et al.. (2023). An analysis of medical malpractice claims against medical oncologists from a national database: Implications for safer practice. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management. 43(3). 18–28. 1 indexed citations
4.
Newman‐Toker, David E., Najlla Nassery, Adam C. Schaffer, et al.. (2023). Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA. BMJ Quality & Safety. 33(2). 109–120. 76 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Sindhu, Kunal K., et al.. (2022). Honoring the public trust: curbing the bane of physician sexual misconduct. Journal of Law and the Biosciences. 9(1). lsac007–lsac007. 3 indexed citations
7.
Schaffer, Adam C., et al.. (2021). Association of Simulation Training With Rates of Medical Malpractice Claims Among Obstetrician–Gynecologists. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 138(2). 246–252. 16 indexed citations
8.
Schaffer, Adam C., et al.. (2021). Rates and Characteristics of Medical Malpractice Claims Against Hospitalists. Journal of Hospital Medicine. 16(7). 390–396. 8 indexed citations
9.
Schaffer, Adam C., et al.. (2021). Association of Simulation Training With Rates of Medical Malpractice Claims Among Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 76(12). 741–742. 1 indexed citations
11.
Newman‐Toker, David E., Adam C. Schaffer, C. Winnie Yu‐Moe, et al.. (2019). Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: The “Big Three” – vascular events, infections, and cancers. Diagnosis. 6(3). 227–240. 104 indexed citations
12.
Glover, McKinley, Derek S. Wilkinson, Harnam Singh, et al.. (2019). Characteristics of Paid Malpractice Claims Among Resident Physicians From 2001 to 2015 in the United States. Academic Medicine. 95(2). 255–262. 10 indexed citations
13.
Topaz, Maxim, Adam C. Schaffer, Kenneth Lai, et al.. (2018). Medical Malpractice Trends: Errors in Automated Speech Recognition. Journal of Medical Systems. 42(8). 153–153. 6 indexed citations
14.
Dalal, Anuj K., Adam C. Schaffer, Esteban Gershanik, et al.. (2018). The Impact of Automated Notification on Follow-up of Actionable Tests Pending at Discharge: a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 33(7). 1043–1051. 9 indexed citations
15.
Schaffer, Adam C., et al.. (2015). A Population-Based Care Improvement Initiative for Patients at Risk for Delirium, Alcohol Withdrawal, and Suicide Harm. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 41(7). 291–AP3. 3 indexed citations
16.
Schaffer, Adam C., Yonatan H. Grad, & John J. Ross. (2010). Bitter Pills. New England Journal of Medicine. 363(16). e26–e26. 1 indexed citations
17.
Schaffer, Adam C. & Jean C. Lee. (2009). Staphylococcal Vaccines and Immunotherapies. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. 23(1). 153–171. 76 indexed citations
18.
Schaffer, Adam C. & Jean C. Lee. (2008). Vaccination and passive immunisation against Staphylococcus aureus. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 32. S71–S78. 107 indexed citations
19.
Schaffer, Adam C., Robert Solinga, Jordan L. Cocchiaro, et al.. (2006). Immunization with Staphylococcus aureus Clumping Factor B, a Major Determinant in Nasal Carriage, Reduces Nasal Colonization in a Murine Model. Infection and Immunity. 74(4). 2145–2153. 132 indexed citations
20.
Locke, Edwin A., Ken G. Smith, Miriam Erez, Dong-Ok Chah, & Adam C. Schaffer. (1994). The Effects of Intra-individual Goal Conflict on Performance. Journal of Management. 20(1). 67–91. 137 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026