Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population
20093.5k citationsAlex B. Haynes, Thomas G. Weiser et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data
20081.7k citationsThomas G. Weiser, Scott E. Regenbogen et al.The Lancetprofile →
Improving Safety with Information Technology
20031.0k citationsAtul A. Gawande et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals
2003798 citationsAtul A. Gawande, Michael J. Zinner et al.profile →
The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992
1999707 citationsAtul A. Gawande, Michael J. Zinner et al.profile →
Risk Factors for Retained Instruments and Sponges after Surgery
2003676 citationsAtul A. Gawande, E. John Orav et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Size and distribution of the global volume of surgery in 2012
2016436 citationsThomas G. Weiser, Alex B. Haynes et al.profile →
Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality
2015414 citationsGeorge Molina, Thomas G. Weiser et al.profile →
Changes in safety attitude and relationship to decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality following implementation of a checklist-based surgical safety intervention
2011362 citationsAlex B. Haynes, Thomas G. Weiser et al.BMJ Quality & Safetyprofile →
Simulation-Based Trial of Surgical-Crisis Checklists
2013358 citationsStuart R. Lipsitz, William R. Berry et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Development of the Serious Illness Care Program: a randomised controlled trial of a palliative care communication intervention
2015322 citationsRachelle Bernacki, Mathilde Hutchings et al.BMJ Openprofile →
Health Insurance Coverage and Health — What the Recent Evidence Tells Us
2017304 citationsAtul A. Gawande et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Effect of the Serious Illness Care Program in Outpatient Oncology
2019249 citationsRachelle Bernacki, Joanna Paladino et al.profile →
Evaluating an Intervention to Improve Communication Between Oncology Clinicians and Patients With Life-Limiting Cancer
2019225 citationsJoanna Paladino, Rachelle Bernacki et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Atul A. Gawande
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Atul A. Gawande's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Atul A. Gawande with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Atul A. Gawande more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Atul A. Gawande. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Atul A. Gawande. The network helps show where Atul A. Gawande may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Atul A. Gawande
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Atul A. Gawande.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Atul A. Gawande based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Atul A. Gawande. Atul A. Gawande is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Weiser, Thomas G., Alex B. Haynes, George Molina, et al.. (2015). Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes. The Lancet. 385. S11–S11.579 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Debas, Haile T., Peter Donkor, Atul A. Gawande, et al.. (2015). Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition : Volume 1. Essential Surgery. World Bank Publications.1 indexed citations
9.
Debas, Haile T., Peter Donkor, Atul A. Gawande, et al.. (2015). Disease Control Priorities.164 indexed citations
10.
Bernacki, Rachelle, Mathilde Hutchings, Judith B. Vick, et al.. (2015). Development of the Serious Illness Care Program: a randomised controlled trial of a palliative care communication intervention. BMJ Open. 5(10). e009032–e009032.322 indexed citations breakdown →
Tsai, Thomas C., Karen E. Joynt, E. John Orav, Atul A. Gawande, & Ashish K. Jha. (2013). Variation in Surgical-Readmission Rates and Quality of Hospital Care. New England Journal of Medicine. 369(12). 1134–1142.555 indexed citations breakdown →
Gawande, Atul A.. (2009). Hellhole: the United States holds tens of thousands of inmates in long-term solitary confinement. Is this torture?. PubMed. 36–45.9 indexed citations
16.
Gawande, Atul A.. (2009). Getting there from here: how should Obama reform health care?. PubMed. 26–33.5 indexed citations
Bickler, Stephen W., David A. Spiegel, Thomas G. Weiser, et al.. (2008). An estimation of the global volume of surgery : a modelling strategy based on available data. Commentary. The Lancet. 372(9633).15 indexed citations
Gawande, Atul A.. (2007). The way we age now: medicine has increased the ranks of the elderly. Can it make old age any easier?. PubMed. 50–9.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.