Luke Mathew
Impact in
- Bioengineering top 10%
- Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
- Insect Science top 10%
- Insect Pheromone Research and Control
Papers in
-
- Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors 7
-
- Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies 7
- Co-authors
- V A Binson (7 shared papers)M. Subramoniam (6 shared papers)George Chandy (1 shared paper)Chee Fui Chong (1 shared paper)Vijay Kumar (1 shared paper)Suresh Kumar (1 shared paper)Chepsy C Philip (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (2 papers)IEEE Sensors Journal (1 paper)Microsystem Technologies (1 paper)Journal of Breath Research (1 paper)Clinica Chimica Acta (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Luke Mathew
8 papers receiving 312 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Bioengineering 31
- Insect Science 62
- Biomedical Engineering 213
- Health Information Management 17
- Sensory Systems 17
Countries citing papers authored by Luke Mathew
This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Mathew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Mathew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Mathew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Mathew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Mathew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Mathew. The network helps show where Luke Mathew may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Luke Mathew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 89 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 70 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 18 | |
| 7 | MOS Based Sensor Array System for the Detection of Human Breath Volatile Organic Compounds | 2021 | 9 |
| 8 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 9 | Five year survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients in Brunei Darussalam | 2013 | 0 |
About Luke Mathew
Luke Mathew is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Insect Science, Infectious Diseases and Neurology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (7 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (7 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (5 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (1 paper), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper), Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper) and Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (31 citations), Insect Science (62 citations), Biomedical Engineering (213 citations), Health Information Management (17 citations) and Sensory Systems (17 citations). Luke Mathew has collaborated with scholars based in India, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include V A Binson, M. Subramoniam, George Chandy, Chee Fui Chong, Vijay Kumar, Suresh Kumar and Chepsy C Philip. Their work appears in journals such as Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, IEEE Sensors Journal, Microsystem Technologies, Journal of Breath Research and Clinica Chimica Acta.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.