Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics

1.9k papers and 44.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics in the last decades have received a total of 44.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics usually cover Molecular Biology (785 papers), Cancer Research (406 papers) and Epidemiology (294 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (227 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (134 papers) and Biosensors and Analytical Detection (98 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics are Abdollah Ardebili, Alireza Tahamtan, Stephen A. Bustin, Jason H. Moore, Theresa L. Whiteside, Farid Ahmed, Amarnath Maitra, Kathleen Dungan, Vadim V. Demidov and Victor Levenson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics.

Countries where authors publish in Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025