Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The theme park experience: An analysis of pleasure, arousal and satisfaction
2004702 citationsJosé Enrique Bigné Alcañiz, Luisa Andreu et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Luisa Andreu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luisa Andreu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luisa Andreu more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luisa Andreu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luisa Andreu. The network helps show where Luisa Andreu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luisa Andreu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luisa Andreu.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luisa Andreu based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Luisa Andreu. Luisa Andreu is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Andreu, Luisa, et al.. (2020). Using social media to promote pro-sustainability behaviours: a quasi-experimental study on message framing. Ereview of tourism research. 17(4).2 indexed citations
Navarro, Susana, et al.. (2015). KEY FACTORS IN VALUE CO-CREATION FOR DISABLED CUSTOMERS AND HOTEL SERVICES. AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF HOTEL MANAGERS. 15–21.3 indexed citations
10.
Andreu, Luisa, et al.. (2012). THE USE OF DIGITAL TRANSMEDIA STORYTELLING FOR CASE STUDIES IN MARKETING EDUCATION. 1406–1414.2 indexed citations
11.
Gnoth, Juergen, et al.. (2012). Conference review: 21st biennial international scientific congress "TOURISM AND HOTEL INDUSTRY 2012". Tourism and hospitality management. 18(1). 159–168.
12.
Andreu, Luisa, et al.. (2011). SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES FOR HIGHER EDUCATION: A CONTENT ANALYSIS AMONG US TOP MBA PROGRAMS. 18–21.1 indexed citations
Alcañiz, José Enrique Bigné, Valérie Swaen, Rubén Chumpitaz, & Luisa Andreu. (2006). La influencia de la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa en el comportamiento de compra de estudiantes universitarios. 37(125). 135.11 indexed citations
15.
Andreu, Luisa, José Enrique Bigné Alcañiz, Rubén Chumpitaz, & Valérie Swaen. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility Influences On University Students Buying Behavior. 10. 135–161.1 indexed citations
16.
Alcañiz, José Enrique Bigné, Rubén Chumpitaz, Luisa Andreu, & Valérie Swaen. (2005). Percepción de laresponsabilidad socialcorporativa: un análisiscross-cultural. Universia business review. 14–27.30 indexed citations
Alcañiz, José Enrique Bigné & Luisa Andreu. (2004). Emociones, satisfacción y lealtad del consumidor en entornos comerciales Un análisis comparativo entre centro comercial y centro urbano. Distribución y consumo. 14(76). 77–88.8 indexed citations
20.
Alcañiz, José Enrique Bigné & Luisa Andreu. (2004). Emotions in segmentation. Annals of Tourism Research. 31(3). 682–696.263 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.