Luís Pinto

31 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

Luís Pinto
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Molecular Medicine 189
  • Clinical Biochemistry 83
  • Pollution 127
  • Endocrinology 56
  • Microbiology 53
Replace Ethan R. Wyrsch with:
Ethan R. Wyrsch Australia
Lindsey Nielsen United States
Yoshifumi Aiba Japan
Tânia Caetano Portugal
Nihal El Nahhas Egypt
Tiago Santos Portugal
Connor Brown United States
Francisco Salvà‐Serra Sweden
Ishi Keenum United States
Jennifer R. Huddleston United States
Luís Pinto relative to Ethan R. Wyrsch Australia Ethan R. Wyrsch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Ethan R. Wyrsch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luís Pinto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luís Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luís Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luís Pinto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luís Pinto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luís Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luís Pinto. The network helps show where Luís Pinto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luís Pinto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luís Pinto Line = papers co-authored together Luís Pinto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200986
2 201051
3 201932
4 201029
5 201029
6 201128
7 201125
8 202419
9 202118
10 201017
11 201517
12 201217
13 202015
14 202215
15 201412
16 201611
17 202110
18 202110
19 20169
20 20048

About Luís Pinto

Luís Pinto is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Food Science and Organic Chemistry, having authored 32 papers that have together received 503 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Horticultural and Viticultural Research (8 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (8 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (5 papers), Edible Oils Quality and Analysis (5 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (4 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (3 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (3 papers) and Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (189 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (83 citations), Pollution (127 citations), Endocrinology (56 citations) and Microbiology (53 citations). Luís Pinto has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Spain and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Gilberto Igrejas, Patrícia Poeta, Hajer Radhouani, Cármen Torres, Alexandre Gonçalves, Céline Coelho, Jorge Rodrigues, Cátia Brito, Carlos M. Correia and Manuel Ângelo Rodrigues. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Proteomics, OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology, Horticulturae, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture and Agronomy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact