Luis de Medinaceli
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Physiology top 10%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- William J. FreedRichard Jed WyattMichel MerleAnthony V. SeaberRobert R. RawlingsAllen C. ChurchAnne‐Marie DucheminTam Quach
- Topics
- Nerve injury and regeneration (16 papers)Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (10 papers)Peripheral Nerve Disorders (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceArgentina
In The Last Decade
Luis de Medinaceli
27 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.2k
- Surgery 632
- Physiology 285
- Developmental Neuroscience 277
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 250
Countries citing papers authored by Luis de Medinaceli
This map shows the geographic impact of Luis de Medinaceli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luis de Medinaceli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luis de Medinaceli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luis de Medinaceli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luis de Medinaceli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luis de Medinaceli. The network helps show where Luis de Medinaceli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luis de Medinaceli
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luis de Medinaceli. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luis de Medinaceli based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luis de Medinaceli. Luis de Medinaceli is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 65 | |
| 5 | 48 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 59 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 84 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 65 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | An index of the functional condition of rat sciatic nerve based on measurements made from walking tracksbreakdown → | 971 |
About Luis de Medinaceli
Luis de Medinaceli is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (16 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (10 papers) and Peripheral Nerve Disorders (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (277 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.2k citations) and Rehabilitation (101 citations). Luis de Medinaceli has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include William J. Freed, Richard Jed Wyatt, Michel Merle, Richard Jed Wyatt, Anthony V. Seaber, Robert R. Rawlings, Allen C. Church, Anne‐Marie Duchemin, Tam Quach and G. J. Lane. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Experimental Neurology and Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.