Lucy Blake
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.5%
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 19
- Demography top 0.5%
- Family Dynamics and Relationships 17
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy 9
- Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life 5
- Safety Research top 2%
- Child Welfare and Adoption 9
- Gender Studies top 5%
-
- Family Support in Illness 6
- Misinformation and Its Impacts 4
-
- Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare 5
- Co-authors
- Susan GolombokVasanti JadvaPolly CaseyJ. ReadingsGabriela RománLucy BrayBernie CarterElizabeth Raffanello
- Journals
- Human Reproduction (5 papers)Developmental Psychology (2 papers)Reproductive BioMedicine Online (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Lucy Blake
49 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Reproductive Medicine 923
- Demography 445
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 640
- Safety Research 217
- Gender Studies 141
Countries citing papers authored by Lucy Blake
This map shows the geographic impact of Lucy Blake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lucy Blake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lucy Blake more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lucy Blake
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lucy Blake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lucy Blake. The network helps show where Lucy Blake may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lucy Blake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 38 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 8 | "I don't like to make a big thing out of it": a qualitative interview-based study exploring factors affecting whether young people tell or do not tell their friends about their IBD.: I don't like to make a big thing out of it | 2020 | 1 |
| 9 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 87 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 55 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 52 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 62 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 108 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 79 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 140 |
About Lucy Blake
Lucy Blake is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Demography and Safety Research, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (19 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (17 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (9 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (9 papers), Family Support in Illness (6 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (5 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (923 citations), Demography (445 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (640 citations). Lucy Blake has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Susan Golombok, Vasanti Jadva, Polly Casey, J. Readings, Gabriela Román, Lucy Bray, Bernie Carter, Elizabeth Raffanello, Anke Α. Ehrhardt and Elena C. Ilioi. Their work appears in journals such as Human Reproduction, Developmental Psychology, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Journal of Child Health Care and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.