Luc Pieters
- Molecular Biology top 1%
- Plant Science top 0.2%
- Food Science top 0.1%
- Organic Chemistry top 0.5%
- Pharmacology top 0.05%
- Co-authors
- Arnold VlietinckSandra ApersTess De BruynePaul CosDirk Vanden BergheMagda ClaeysK. CimangaNina Hermans
- Topics
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (90 papers)Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (71 papers)Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (59 papers)
- Cited by
- BiochemistryPharmacologyHorticulture
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaDiabetes CareJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Partner nations
- BelgiumDemocratic Republic of the CongoCuba
In The Last Decade
Luc Pieters
435 papers receiving 13.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 171
- Molecular Biology 6.0k
- Plant Science 5.2k
- Food Science 2.7k
- Organic Chemistry 2.5k
- Pharmacology 2.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Luc Pieters
This map shows the geographic impact of Luc Pieters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luc Pieters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luc Pieters more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luc Pieters
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luc Pieters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luc Pieters. The network helps show where Luc Pieters may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luc Pieters
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luc Pieters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luc Pieters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luc Pieters. Luc Pieters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 52 | |
| 20 | Antiangiogenic activity of natural products: **in vivo** and **in vitro** test models | 4 |
About Luc Pieters
Luc Pieters is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Horticulture and Biochemistry, having authored 445 papers that have together received 14.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (90 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (71 papers) and Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (59 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (1.8k citations), Pharmacology (2.2k citations) and Horticulture (172 citations). Luc Pieters has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Cuba. Frequent co-authors include Arnold Vlietinck, Sandra Apers, Tess De Bruyne, Paul Cos, Dirk Vanden Berghe, Magda Claeys, K. Cimanga, Nina Hermans, M. Calomme and J. Totté. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Diabetes Care and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.