Louise Doswald-Beck
- Political Science and International Relations top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Philosophy top 5%
- History top 2%
- Law top 5%
- Topics
- International Law and Human Rights (24 papers)Global Peace and Security Dynamics (16 papers)Military and Defense Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Louise Doswald-Beck
30 papers receiving 458 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Political Science and International Relations 607
- Sociology and Political Science 317
- Philosophy 92
- History 81
- Law 35
Countries citing papers authored by Louise Doswald-Beck
This map shows the geographic impact of Louise Doswald-Beck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louise Doswald-Beck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louise Doswald-Beck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Louise Doswald-Beck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louise Doswald-Beck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louise Doswald-Beck. The network helps show where Louise Doswald-Beck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louise Doswald-Beck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louise Doswald-Beck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louise Doswald-Beck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Louise Doswald-Beck. Louise Doswald-Beck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unexpected Challenges: The Increasingly Evident Disadvantage of Considering International Humanitarian Law in Isolation | 0 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Droit international humanitaire coutumier | 2 |
| 4 | Customary International Humanitarian Lawbreakdown → | 383 |
| 5 | Some Thoughts on Computer Network Attack and the International Law of Armed Conflict | 3 |
| 6 | Implementation of International Humanitarian Law in Future Wars | 6 |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | Blinding weapons : reports of the meetings of experts convened by the International Committee of the Red Cross on Battlefiled Laser Weapons 1989-1991 | 14 |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 48 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 43 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Louise Doswald-Beck
Louise Doswald-Beck is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Transportation and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 40 papers that have together received 724 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Human Rights (24 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (16 papers) and Military and Defense Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (607 citations), Space and Planetary Science (13 citations) and Philosophy (92 citations). Louise Doswald-Beck has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Knut Dörmann, Jean‐Marie Henckaerts, Sylvain Vité, Robert Kolb, Robin M. Coupland and Veijo Hoikka. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Peace Research and American Journal of International Law.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.