Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Development and Distortion of Malaysian Public- Private Partnerships: Patronage, Privatised Profits and Pitfalls DOI: 10.1111/j.1467- 8500.2009.00655.x
This map shows the geographic impact of Loo‐See Beh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Loo‐See Beh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loo‐See Beh more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Loo‐See Beh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Loo‐See Beh. The network helps show where Loo‐See Beh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Loo‐See Beh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Loo‐See Beh.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Loo‐See Beh based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Loo‐See Beh. Loo‐See Beh is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Iftikhar, Mehwish & Loo‐See Beh. (2019). Grim consequences of workplace traditional bullying and cyberbullying by way of mediation: A case of service sector of Pakistan. The University of Malaya Research Repository (University of Malaya).2 indexed citations
10.
Beh, Loo‐See, et al.. (2018). Impact of Intellectual Capital on Organizational Performance: Evidence from a Developing Country. Academy of strategic management journal. 17(2). 1.16 indexed citations
11.
Masum, Abdul Kadar Muhammad, et al.. (2018). Intelligent human resource information system (i-HRIS): a holistic decision support framework for HR excellence.. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology. 15. 121–130.56 indexed citations
12.
Beh, Loo‐See & Imran Shafique. (2016). The Nexus between Transformational Leadership and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Mediating Role of Absorptive Capacity. Transylvanian Review. 24(3).1 indexed citations
13.
Shah, Syed Haider Ali & Loo‐See Beh. (2016). The Impact of Motivation Enhancing Practices and Mediating Role of Talent Engagement on Turnover Intentions: Evidence from Malaysia. International Review of Management and Marketing. 6(4). 823–835.25 indexed citations
14.
Beh, Loo‐See. (2015). Managing across Public-Private Partnerships: A Review of Implementation in China and Australia. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
15.
Beh, Loo‐See. (2014). Public Sector Performance in Malaysia: An Evaluation of Employee Empowerment and Self- Leadership. 9(1).4 indexed citations
Beh, Loo‐See, et al.. (2012). Financial education: Determinant of retirement planning in malaysia. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 3(2). 69–78.17 indexed citations
19.
Beh, Loo‐See. (2011). "Left-Behind Children" Phenomenon in China: Case study in Chongqing.. 3(2). 167.8 indexed citations
20.
Beh, Loo‐See. (2010). Public-private partnerships in China: A responsive participation ∗. Journal of US-China Public Administration. 7(8). 30–35.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.