Loes Knaapen
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Physiology
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Co-authors
- George WeiszAlberto CambrosioVirginie TournayPeter KeatingThomas SchlichPascale LehouxMarije S Koelewijn-van LoonJako Burgers
- Topics
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation (6 papers)Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers)Menstrual Health and Disorders (2 papers)
- Cited by
- General Health ProfessionsPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthMedical Terminology
- Journals
- Social Science & MedicineJournal of the American Medical Informatics AssociationBMC Health Services Research
- Partner nations
- CanadaNetherlandsFrance
In The Last Decade
Loes Knaapen
12 papers receiving 418 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 232
- General Health Professions 215
- Economics and Econometrics 91
- Physiology 32
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 31
Countries citing papers authored by Loes Knaapen
This map shows the geographic impact of Loes Knaapen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Loes Knaapen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loes Knaapen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Loes Knaapen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Loes Knaapen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Loes Knaapen. The network helps show where Loes Knaapen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Loes Knaapen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Loes Knaapen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Loes Knaapen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Loes Knaapen. Loes Knaapen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 74 | |
| 9 | 54 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 150 | |
| 14 | 12 |
About Loes Knaapen
Loes Knaapen is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 14 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical practice guidelines implementation (6 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers) and Menstrual Health and Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (215 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (232 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). Loes Knaapen has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include George Weisz, Alberto Cambrosio, Virginie Tournay, Peter Keating, Thomas Schlich, Pascale Lehoux, Marije S Koelewijn-van Loon, Jako Burgers, France Légaré and Arwen H. Pieterse. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and BMC Health Services Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.