Lisa Zadro
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rick RichardsonKipling D. WilliamsMegan OatenAndrew JonesKaren GonsalkoraleKathleen O’MooreDavid J. HawesElena Svetieva
- Topics
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (15 papers)Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (15 papers)Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaCurrent Directions in Psychological ScienceJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesPortugal
In The Last Decade
Lisa Zadro
17 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Social Psychology 1.4k
- Clinical Psychology 796
- Sociology and Political Science 442
- Applied Psychology 284
- Health 245
Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Zadro
This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Zadro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Zadro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Zadro more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Zadro
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Zadro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Zadro. The network helps show where Lisa Zadro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa Zadro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa Zadro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa Zadro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa Zadro. Lisa Zadro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Facing exclusion and smiling through the pain: positive emotion expression during interpersonal ostracism | 1 |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 32 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 47 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 73 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 159 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 260 | |
| 15 | 116 | |
| 16 | How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existencebreakdown → | 820 |
| 17 | 22 |
About Lisa Zadro
Lisa Zadro is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (15 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (15 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (1.4k citations), Applied Psychology (284 citations) and Clinical Psychology (796 citations). Lisa Zadro has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Rick Richardson, Kipling D. Williams, Kipling D. Williams, Megan Oaten, Andrew Jones, Karen Gonsalkorale, Kathleen O’Moore, David J. Hawes, Elena Svetieva and Mark R. Dadds. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Current Directions in Psychological Science and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.