David R. Schurtz
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- David J. CombsC. Nathan DeWallCaitlin PowellRichard H. SmithCarrie L. MastenJean M. TwengeBrittany GentileKatharine Lacefield
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers)Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEPsychological Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaTürkiye
In The Last Decade
David R. Schurtz
14 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Social Psychology 706
- Clinical Psychology 440
- Cognitive Neuroscience 264
- Sociology and Political Science 255
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 242
Countries citing papers authored by David R. Schurtz
This map shows the geographic impact of David R. Schurtz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David R. Schurtz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David R. Schurtz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David R. Schurtz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David R. Schurtz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David R. Schurtz. The network helps show where David R. Schurtz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David R. Schurtz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David R. Schurtz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David R. Schurtz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David R. Schurtz. David R. Schurtz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 44 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 49 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | Connecting social psychology to the experience of others through a nonfiction book analysis: New wine in an old bottle | 1 |
| 6 | SOCIAL COMPARISON SEEKING: PROVIDING GENERAL COMPARISON CURTAILS LOCAL COMPARISON | 1 |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 150 | |
| 9 | 64 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 319 | |
| 12 | 76 | |
| 13 | 121 | |
| 14 | 349 |
About David R. Schurtz
David R. Schurtz is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers) and Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (706 citations), Clinical Psychology (440 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (242 citations). David R. Schurtz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include David J. Combs, C. Nathan DeWall, Caitlin Powell, Richard H. Smith, Carrie L. Masten, Jean M. Twenge, Brittany Gentile, Katharine Lacefield, Naomi I. Eisenberger and Gregory D. Webster. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.