Lisa Whisker

2.3k total citations
36 papers, 233 citations indexed

About

Lisa Whisker is a scholar working on Surgery, Cancer Research and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Lisa Whisker has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 233 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Surgery, 12 papers in Cancer Research and 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Lisa Whisker's work include Breast Implant and Reconstruction (24 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (18 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (12 papers). Lisa Whisker is often cited by papers focused on Breast Implant and Reconstruction (24 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (18 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (12 papers). Lisa Whisker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Germany. Lisa Whisker's co-authors include Shelley Potter, Steven Thrush, Joanna Skillman, Douglas M. Bowley, Charles Hendrickse, Anthony Lander, David R. Luke, David Bartlett, George Dowswell and Thomas Pinkney and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, BMJ and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

Lisa Whisker

32 papers receiving 228 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lisa Whisker United Kingdom 9 174 87 34 32 30 36 233
Fahima Osman Canada 6 280 1.6× 135 1.6× 53 1.6× 32 1.0× 23 0.8× 10 397
Brittany J. Behar United States 7 285 1.6× 104 1.2× 26 0.8× 15 0.5× 14 0.5× 15 327
Taylor Aiken United States 11 116 0.7× 21 0.2× 70 2.1× 26 0.8× 39 1.3× 25 265
Roderick F. Schmitz Netherlands 7 183 1.1× 115 1.3× 84 2.5× 21 0.7× 34 1.1× 15 354
Shivanchan Rajmohan United Kingdom 7 120 0.7× 40 0.5× 17 0.5× 6 0.2× 35 1.2× 10 202
Ishani Barai United Kingdom 5 119 0.7× 40 0.5× 17 0.5× 6 0.2× 24 0.8× 5 180
Yonge Jones United States 7 169 1.0× 56 0.6× 71 2.1× 8 0.3× 17 0.6× 10 301
Mark Ho-Asjoe United Kingdom 12 283 1.6× 58 0.7× 17 0.5× 12 0.4× 32 1.1× 22 348
Caterina Santi Italy 6 291 1.7× 91 1.0× 54 1.6× 12 0.4× 5 0.2× 7 321
Raj Achuthan United Kingdom 7 71 0.4× 49 0.6× 32 0.9× 14 0.4× 11 0.4× 17 152

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Whisker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Whisker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Whisker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Whisker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Whisker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Whisker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Whisker. The network helps show where Lisa Whisker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa Whisker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa Whisker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa Whisker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa Whisker. Lisa Whisker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Davies, Charlotte, Nicola Mills, Patricia Fairbrother, et al.. (2024). Understanding decision-making for and against oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery as an alternative to a mastectomy in early breast cancer: UK ANTHEM qualitative study. British journal of surgery. 111(6). 3 indexed citations
2.
Davies, Charlotte, Leigh Johnson, Nicola Mills, et al.. (2024). Clinical and patient-reported outcomes in women offered oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery as an alternative to mastectomy: ANTHEM multicentre prospective cohort study. British journal of surgery. 112(1). 1 indexed citations
3.
Davies, Charlotte, Lisa Whisker, Joanna Skillman, et al.. (2023). Current practice and provision of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in the UK: results of the ANTHEM national practice questionnaire. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 200(2). 163–170. 6 indexed citations
4.
James, Jonathan J., et al.. (2022). Which lesions with a radiological or core biopsy diagnosis of fibroadenoma should be excised?. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 104(5). 361–366. 7 indexed citations
5.
Rajan, Sreekumar Sundara, et al.. (2022). Angiosarcoma arising in the capsule of a mammary silicone implant. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 50(5). E119–E122. 2 indexed citations
8.
Turner, Nicholas, Elizabeth J. Conroy, J Skillman, et al.. (2021). Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh. BJS Open. 5(1). 21 indexed citations
9.
Whisker, Lisa, Matthew Barber, Donna Egbeare, et al.. (2021). Biological and synthetic mesh assisted breast reconstruction procedures: Joint guidelines from the Association of Breast Surgery and the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 47(11). 2807–2813. 9 indexed citations
10.
Potter, Shelley, Nicholas J. Turner, Elizabeth Conroy, et al.. (2021). P060. Exploring best peri-operative practice for implant-based breast reconstruction: Further analysis from the iBRA prospective multicentre cohort study. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 47(5). e311–e312. 1 indexed citations
11.
Mahoney, Bérénice, Elaine Walklet, Eleanor Bradley, et al.. (2020). Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: qualitative study. BJS Open. 4(3). 380–390. 21 indexed citations
12.
Potter, Shelley, Charlotte Davies, Christopher Holcombe, et al.. (2020). International development and implementation of a core measurement set for research and audit studies in implant-based breast reconstruction: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 10(1). e035505–e035505. 5 indexed citations
13.
Challoner, Tom, et al.. (2018). Oncoplastic techniques: Attitudes and changing practice amongst breast and plastic surgeons in Great Britain. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 44(6). 872–872. 1 indexed citations
15.
Agrawal, Amit, R. Douglas Macmillan, Eleanor Gutteridge, et al.. (2015). Changing trends in consultant practice and breast training in the UK. Bulletin of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 97(4). E11–E14. 2 indexed citations
16.
Dowswell, George, David Bartlett, Kaori Futaba, Lisa Whisker, & Thomas Pinkney. (2014). How to set up and manage a trainee-led research collaborative. BMC Medical Education. 14(1). 94–94. 24 indexed citations
17.
Hardwicke, Joseph, et al.. (2013). Attitudes of UK breast and plastic surgeons to lipomodelling in breast surgery. The Breast. 22(6). 1200–1204. 7 indexed citations
18.
Tan, Jing‐Yu, et al.. (2013). An evaluation of higher surgical trainees’ expectations from an online-learning resource. International Journal of Surgery. 11(8). 694–694. 1 indexed citations
19.
Whisker, Lisa, et al.. (2010). Breast Cancer Outcomes Ethnicity Study (CanOES): Investigating the relationship between survival and ethnicity. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 36(11). 1100–1100. 1 indexed citations
20.
Whisker, Lisa, David R. Luke, Charles Hendrickse, Douglas M. Bowley, & Anthony Lander. (2009). Appendicitis in children: a comparative study between a specialist paediatric centre and a district general hospital. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 44(2). 362–367. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026