Steven Thrush

976 total citations
22 papers, 361 citations indexed

About

Steven Thrush is a scholar working on Surgery, Cancer Research and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven Thrush has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 361 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Surgery, 6 papers in Cancer Research and 4 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Steven Thrush's work include Breast Implant and Reconstruction (12 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (10 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (6 papers). Steven Thrush is often cited by papers focused on Breast Implant and Reconstruction (12 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (10 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (6 papers). Steven Thrush collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Germany. Steven Thrush's co-authors include R B Galland, Ridzuan Farouk, M G Tytherleigh, J. Michael Dixon, J.M. O’Donoghue, Ashu Gandhi, E. Jane Macaskill, Richard K. Johnson, Kieran Horgan and Shameen Jaunoo and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Annals of Surgery and European Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Steven Thrush

21 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Steven Thrush United Kingdom 11 232 87 56 53 37 22 361
Ishwarya Balasubramanian Ireland 10 112 0.5× 79 0.9× 73 1.3× 111 2.1× 9 0.2× 31 334
Ryota Teramoto Japan 14 206 0.9× 59 0.7× 18 0.3× 28 0.5× 3 0.1× 26 498
Jon M. Greif United States 6 149 0.6× 47 0.5× 35 0.6× 83 1.6× 68 1.8× 9 333
Mustafa Şahin Türkiye 9 173 0.7× 15 0.2× 65 1.2× 26 0.5× 15 0.4× 40 284
K Akazawa Japan 6 102 0.4× 54 0.6× 15 0.3× 63 1.2× 2 0.1× 9 370
Marley Ribeiro Feitosa Brazil 10 75 0.3× 26 0.3× 14 0.3× 49 0.9× 6 0.2× 45 403
Jessica Limberg United States 12 191 0.8× 20 0.2× 32 0.6× 74 1.4× 15 0.4× 31 363
Talar Tatarian United States 10 192 0.8× 33 0.4× 43 0.8× 48 0.9× 30 0.8× 28 282
Caroline Badger United Kingdom 9 470 2.0× 55 0.6× 111 2.0× 722 13.6× 31 0.8× 21 835
Seyfi Emir Türkiye 8 233 1.0× 14 0.2× 17 0.3× 140 2.6× 15 0.4× 34 296

Countries citing papers authored by Steven Thrush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Thrush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Thrush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Thrush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Thrush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Thrush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Thrush. The network helps show where Steven Thrush may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven Thrush

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven Thrush. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven Thrush based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven Thrush. Steven Thrush is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Turner, Nicholas, Elizabeth J. Conroy, J Skillman, et al.. (2021). Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh. BJS Open. 5(1). 21 indexed citations
3.
Potter, Shelley, Nicholas J. Turner, Elizabeth Conroy, et al.. (2021). P060. Exploring best peri-operative practice for implant-based breast reconstruction: Further analysis from the iBRA prospective multicentre cohort study. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 47(5). e311–e312. 1 indexed citations
4.
Potter, Shelley, Charlotte Davies, Christopher Holcombe, et al.. (2020). International development and implementation of a core measurement set for research and audit studies in implant-based breast reconstruction: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 10(1). e035505–e035505. 5 indexed citations
5.
Mahoney, Bérénice, Elaine Walklet, Eleanor Bradley, et al.. (2020). Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: qualitative study. BJS Open. 4(3). 380–390. 21 indexed citations
7.
Mylvaganam, Senthurun, et al.. (2015). Phylloides tumours of the breast: best practice for follow-up. Updates in Surgery. 67(1). 91–95. 8 indexed citations
8.
Potter, Shelley, et al.. (2014). The iBRA study: A national multicentre audit of the outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction with and without lower pole support. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 67(10). 1467–1468. 2 indexed citations
9.
Potter, Shelley, et al.. (2014). 442. The iBRA Study: A national multicentre audit of the practice and outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 40(11). S168–S169. 3 indexed citations
10.
Mylvaganam, Senthurun, Robin J. Taylor, & Steven Thrush. (2013). Poly implant breast implants (PIP) and the rupture risk in asymptomatic patients: a warning for greater clinician suspicion in assessment and counselling. Journal of Surgical Case Reports. 2013(2). rjs044–rjs044. 2 indexed citations
11.
O’Donoghue, J.M., et al.. (2013). Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) assisted breast reconstruction procedures. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 39(5). 425–429. 65 indexed citations
12.
Jaunoo, Shameen, et al.. (2010). Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH): A brief review. International Journal of Surgery. 9(1). 20–22. 28 indexed citations
13.
Bright-Thomas, Rachel, et al.. (2010). Pseudomonal breast infection. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 92(3). e20–e22. 4 indexed citations
14.
Shetty, Geeta, Fiona Lewis, & Steven Thrush. (2007). Morphea of the Breast: Case Reports and Review of Literature. The Breast Journal. 13(3). 302–304. 11 indexed citations
15.
Macaskill, E. Jane, et al.. (2006). Surgeons’ views on multi-disciplinary breast meetings. European Journal of Cancer. 42(7). 905–908. 44 indexed citations
16.
Frith, Daniel, et al.. (2005). Lead poisoning – a differential diagnosis for abdominal pain. The Lancet. 366(9503). 2146–2146. 24 indexed citations
17.
Tytherleigh, M G, et al.. (2005). Intra-operative peritoneal lavage – who does it and why?. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 87(4). 255–258. 68 indexed citations
18.
Thrush, Steven, et al.. (2002). Does radical surgery to the axilla give a survival advantage in more severe breast cancer?. European Journal of Cancer. 38(11). 1474–1477. 7 indexed citations
19.
Thrush, Steven, et al.. (2002). Acute stridor secondary to recurrent multinodular goitre after previous subtotal thyroidectomy: compartment syndrome of the neck. The European Journal of Surgery. 168(6). 372–373.
20.
Thrush, Steven, et al.. (2001). Primary Autologous Superficial Femoral Vein Reconstruction of an Emergency, Infected, Ruptured Aortic Aneurysm. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 22(6). 557–558. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026