Lisa Campo‐Engelstein

1.3k citations
66 papers · 676 indexed · h-index 16

Lisa Campo‐Engelstein

63 papers receiving 646 citations

Peers

Lisa Campo‐Engelstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Reproductive Medicine 380
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 394
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 186
  • Gender Studies 56
  • Social Psychology 110
Replace Hadar Amir with:
Hadar Amir Israel
Veerle Provoost Belgium
Emily Koert Denmark
Norah M. van Mello Netherlands
Halley P. Crissman United States
Stephanie Roberts United States
Alexis Light United States
L. Millheiser United States
Wayne R. Gillett New Zealand
Kjell Wånggren Sweden
Lisa Campo‐Engelstein relative to Hadar Amir Israel Hadar Amir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Hadar Amir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Campo‐Engelstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Campo‐Engelstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Campo‐Engelstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Campo‐Engelstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Campo‐Engelstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Campo‐Engelstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Campo‐Engelstein. The network helps show where Lisa Campo‐Engelstein may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lisa Campo‐Engelstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisa Campo‐Engelstein Line = papers co-authored together Lisa Campo‐Engelstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20241
4 20230
5 20232
6 20231
7 20225
8 202113
9 202117
10 202012
11 20205
12 201716
13 201715
14 201512
15 20137
16 201224
17 20127
18 20113
19 20112
20 201024

About Lisa Campo‐Engelstein

Lisa Campo‐Engelstein is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 66 papers that have together received 676 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (43 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (20 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (15 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (10 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (7 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (7 papers), Ethics in medical practice (6 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (380 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (394 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (186 citations). Lisa Campo‐Engelstein has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Rodriguez, Zubin Master, Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Wendy M. Parker, Timothy Caulfield, Teresa K. Woodruff, Nadia Johnson, Wayne Shelton, Emilie K. Johnson and Candace Tingen. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Clinical Oncology and PEDIATRICS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026