Lisa Campo‐Engelstein
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Reproductive Medicine top 2%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Sarah RodriguezZubin MasterGwendolyn P. QuinnWendy M. ParkerTimothy CaulfieldTeresa K. WoodruffNadia JohnsonWayne Shelton
- Topics
- Reproductive Health and Technologies (43 papers)Reproductive Biology and Fertility (20 papers)Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (15 papers)
- Cited by
- Reproductive MedicinePublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Lisa Campo‐Engelstein
63 papers receiving 646 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 394
- Reproductive Medicine 380
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 186
- Social Psychology 110
- Molecular Biology 103
Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Campo‐Engelstein
This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Campo‐Engelstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Campo‐Engelstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Campo‐Engelstein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Campo‐Engelstein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Campo‐Engelstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Campo‐Engelstein. The network helps show where Lisa Campo‐Engelstein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa Campo‐Engelstein
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa Campo‐Engelstein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa Campo‐Engelstein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa Campo‐Engelstein. Lisa Campo‐Engelstein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About Lisa Campo‐Engelstein
Lisa Campo‐Engelstein is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 66 papers that have together received 676 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (43 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (20 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (380 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (394 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (186 citations). Lisa Campo‐Engelstein has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Rodriguez, Zubin Master, Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Wendy M. Parker, Timothy Caulfield, Teresa K. Woodruff, Nadia Johnson, Wayne Shelton, Emilie K. Johnson and Candace Tingen. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Clinical Oncology and PEDIATRICS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.