Grayson R. Jackson

591 total citations
10 papers, 376 citations indexed

About

Grayson R. Jackson is a scholar working on Genetics, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Grayson R. Jackson has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 376 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Genetics, 2 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Grayson R. Jackson's work include Forensic and Genetic Research (3 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (2 papers). Grayson R. Jackson is often cited by papers focused on Forensic and Genetic Research (3 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (2 papers). Grayson R. Jackson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Grayson R. Jackson's co-authors include I.W. Evett, J.A. Lambert, Susan Jones, Christophe Champod, Sue Black, Christopher Rynn, Simon K. Bramble and Lisa Campo‐Engelstein and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Forensic Sciences, International Journal of Legal Medicine and The Hastings Center Report.

In The Last Decade

Grayson R. Jackson

8 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Grayson R. Jackson United Kingdom 5 174 77 47 45 43 10 376
Graham Jackson United Kingdom 10 140 0.8× 70 0.9× 29 0.6× 53 1.2× 26 0.6× 17 300
Paolo Garbolino Italy 12 186 1.1× 226 2.9× 47 1.0× 63 1.4× 56 1.3× 26 601
Keith Inman United States 13 261 1.5× 45 0.6× 46 1.0× 143 3.2× 47 1.1× 22 554
Bernard Robertson New Zealand 8 124 0.7× 124 1.6× 22 0.5× 19 0.4× 48 1.1× 25 399
Silvia Bozza Switzerland 14 189 1.1× 190 2.5× 66 1.4× 71 1.6× 93 2.2× 46 650
Amanda B. Hepler United States 5 244 1.4× 87 1.1× 22 0.5× 69 1.5× 13 0.3× 10 419
R. Cook United Kingdom 11 340 2.0× 117 1.5× 131 2.8× 89 2.0× 92 2.1× 17 743
David A. Stoney United States 14 336 1.9× 111 1.4× 128 2.7× 79 1.8× 100 2.3× 36 752
Nicole Egli Switzerland 9 155 0.9× 47 0.6× 130 2.8× 14 0.3× 26 0.6× 15 322
Roberto Puch‐Solis United Kingdom 10 305 1.8× 69 0.9× 91 1.9× 147 3.3× 26 0.6× 24 416

Countries citing papers authored by Grayson R. Jackson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grayson R. Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grayson R. Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grayson R. Jackson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grayson R. Jackson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grayson R. Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grayson R. Jackson. The network helps show where Grayson R. Jackson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Grayson R. Jackson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Grayson R. Jackson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Grayson R. Jackson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Grayson R. Jackson. Grayson R. Jackson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Jackson, Grayson R., et al.. (2025). Exceptional Stigma: Parallels Between Marginalized Groups and Psychedelic Medicine. The American Journal of Bioethics. 25(1). 110–112.
2.
Jackson, Grayson R., et al.. (2025). Just Knowledge and Treatment: Formal and Epistemic Injustice in Pediatric Gender-Affirming Care. The American Journal of Bioethics. 25(6). 76–78.
3.
Campo‐Engelstein, Lisa, et al.. (2024). Breaking Binaries: The Critical Need for Feminist Bioethics in Pediatric Gender‐Affirming Care. The Hastings Center Report. 54(3). 55–56. 1 indexed citations
4.
Black, Sue, et al.. (2013). The incidence and position of melanocytic nevi for the purposes of forensic image comparison. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 128(3). 535–543. 18 indexed citations
5.
Jackson, Grayson R., et al.. (2006). The nature of forensic science opinion—a possible framework to guide thinking and practicce in investigation and in court proceedings. Science & Justice. 46(1). 33–44. 101 indexed citations
6.
Evett, I.W., Grayson R. Jackson, & J.A. Lambert. (2000). More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions. Science & Justice. 40(1). 3–10. 119 indexed citations
7.
Evett, I.W., et al.. (2000). The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements. Science & Justice. 40(4). 233–239. 126 indexed citations
8.
Jackson, Grayson R.. (1995). Electronic imaging of fingermarks. 1995. 261–266. 2 indexed citations
9.
Jackson, Grayson R.. (1994). A High Resolution Electronic Imaging System for Crime Scene Use. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 39(4). 912–919. 3 indexed citations
10.
Bramble, Simon K. & Grayson R. Jackson. (1994). Operational Experience of Fingermark Enhancement by Frequency Domain Filtering. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 39(4). 920–932. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026