Emily Koert

1.4k citations
41 papers · 876 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Emily Koert

37 papers receiving 846 citations

Peers

Emily Koert
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Reproductive Medicine 627
  • Demography 276
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 415
  • Gender Studies 138
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 267
Replace Mariana V. Martins with:
Mariana V. Martins Portugal
Andrea Mechanick Braverman United States
Kathleen S. Slauson‐Blevins United States
Sally Sheldon United Kingdom
Eline Dancet Belgium
Veerle Provoost Belgium
Satvinder Purewal United Kingdom
Tewes Wischmann Germany
L. Jill Halman United States
Piia Poikkeus Finland
Emily Koert relative to Mariana V. Martins Portugal Mariana V. Martins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Mariana V. Martins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Koert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Koert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Koert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Koert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Koert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Koert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Koert. The network helps show where Emily Koert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Koert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Koert Line = papers co-authored together Emily Koert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011138
2 201495
3 201287
4 201864
5 201659
6 201254
7 201843
8 201637
9 201737
10 201932
11 201826
12 201023
13 202022
14 201118
15 201718
16 202115
17 202315
18 201812
19 201811
20 202110

About Emily Koert

Emily Koert is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Demography, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 41 papers that have together received 876 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (33 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (27 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (21 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (3 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers) and Sexual function and dysfunction studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (627 citations), Demography (276 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (415 citations), Gender Studies (138 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (267 citations). Emily Koert has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Judith C. Daniluk, Anthony P. Cheung, Jacky Boivin, Lone Schmidt, Randi Sylvest, Janet Takefman, Norman E. Amundson, Henriette Svarre Nielsen, Maria Christine Krog and William A. Borgen. Their work appears in journals such as Human Reproduction, Fertility and Sterility, The Career Development Quarterly, Reproductive BioMedicine Online and Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact