Emily Koert

1.4k total citations
41 papers, 876 citations indexed

About

Emily Koert is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Demography. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Koert has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 876 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 27 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 21 papers in Demography. Recurrent topics in Emily Koert's work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (33 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (27 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (21 papers). Emily Koert is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Health and Technologies (33 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (27 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (21 papers). Emily Koert collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, Canada and United Kingdom. Emily Koert's co-authors include Judith C. Daniluk, Anthony P. Cheung, Jacky Boivin, Lone Schmidt, Randi Sylvest, Henriette Svarre Nielsen, Astrid Marie Kolte, Maria Christine Krog, Norman E. Amundson and William A. Borgen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Human Reproduction and Fertility and Sterility.

In The Last Decade

Emily Koert

37 papers receiving 846 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Koert Denmark 16 627 415 276 267 138 41 876
Andrea Mechanick Braverman United States 17 831 1.3× 591 1.4× 314 1.1× 148 0.6× 63 0.5× 30 939
Mariana V. Martins Portugal 16 691 1.1× 485 1.2× 362 1.3× 150 0.6× 97 0.7× 47 952
Kathleen S. Slauson‐Blevins United States 12 908 1.4× 545 1.3× 453 1.6× 130 0.5× 154 1.1× 22 1.1k
Veerle Provoost Belgium 21 750 1.2× 546 1.3× 98 0.4× 425 1.6× 109 0.8× 76 1.1k
Eline Dancet Belgium 20 1.3k 2.1× 767 1.8× 226 0.8× 517 1.9× 44 0.3× 66 1.6k
Satvinder Purewal United Kingdom 13 345 0.6× 246 0.6× 105 0.4× 168 0.6× 36 0.3× 23 557
Sally Sheldon United Kingdom 17 334 0.5× 195 0.5× 58 0.2× 293 1.1× 161 1.2× 70 798
Marilyn Crawshaw United Kingdom 19 866 1.4× 596 1.4× 133 0.5× 462 1.7× 136 1.0× 56 1.1k
L. Jill Halman United States 12 510 0.8× 355 0.9× 353 1.3× 108 0.4× 27 0.2× 13 706
Tewes Wischmann Germany 24 1.8k 2.8× 1.2k 2.8× 745 2.7× 375 1.4× 109 0.8× 94 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Koert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Koert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Koert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Koert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Koert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Koert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Koert. The network helps show where Emily Koert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Koert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Koert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Koert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Koert. Emily Koert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
3.
Sylvest, Randi, et al.. (2024). How to talk to young adults about fertility. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 49(1). 103937–103937. 2 indexed citations
4.
Schmidt, Lone, Emily Koert, Jeanette Bogstad, et al.. (2023). Psychosocial wellbeing shortly after allocation to a freeze-all strategy compared with a fresh transfer strategy in women and men: a sub-study of a randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction. 38(11). 2175–2186. 2 indexed citations
5.
Koert, Emily, et al.. (2023). ‘You’re never pregnant in the same way again’: prior early pregnancy loss influences need for health care and support in subsequent pregnancy. Human Reproduction Open. 2023(3). hoad032–hoad032. 1 indexed citations
6.
Martins, Mariana V., Emily Koert, Randi Sylvest, et al.. (2023). Fertility education: recommendations for developing and implementing tools to improve fertility literacy. Human Reproduction. 39(2). 293–302. 15 indexed citations
7.
8.
Krog, Maria Christine, et al.. (2021). Meditation and mindfulness reduce perceived stress in women with recurrent pregnancy loss: a randomized controlled trial. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 43(2). 246–256. 15 indexed citations
9.
Strizzi, Jenna Marie, Emily Koert, Camilla S. Øverup, et al.. (2021). Examining gender effects in postdivorce adjustment trajectories over the first year after divorce in Denmark.. Journal of Family Psychology. 36(2). 268–279. 10 indexed citations
10.
Koert, Emily, Randi Sylvest, Ida Vittrup, et al.. (2021). The importance of the ‘family clock’: women’s lived experience of fertility decision-making 6 years after attending the Fertility Assessment and Counselling Clinic. Human Fertility. 25(5). 954–966. 1 indexed citations
11.
Koert, Emily, Randi Sylvest, Ida Vittrup, et al.. (2020). Women’s perceptions of fertility assessment and counselling 6 years after attending a Fertility Assessment and Counselling clinic in Denmark. Human Reproduction Open. 2020(4). 8 indexed citations
12.
Sylvest, Randi, Anja Pinborg, Emily Koert, et al.. (2018). Low semen quality and experiences of masculinity and family building. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 97(6). 727–733. 26 indexed citations
13.
Sylvest, Randi, Emily Koert, Kathrine Birch Petersen, et al.. (2018). Attitudes towards family formation among men attending fertility counselling. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6. 1–9. 8 indexed citations
14.
Daniluk, Judith C. & Emily Koert. (2016). Childless women's beliefs and knowledge about oocyte freezing for social and medical reasons. Human Reproduction. 31(10). 2313–2320. 59 indexed citations
15.
Boivin, Jacky, et al.. (2016). Perceived challenges of working in a fertility clinic: a qualitative analysis of work stressors and difficulties working with patients. Human Reproduction. 32(2). 403–408. 37 indexed citations
16.
Daniluk, Judith C. & Emily Koert. (2014). Fertility awareness online: the efficacy of a fertility education website in increasing knowledge and changing fertility beliefs. Human Reproduction. 30(2). 353–363. 95 indexed citations
17.
Koert, Emily. (2012). An unacknowledged loss: the experience of permanent, unintentional childlessness for women who delayed childbearing. Fertility and Sterility. 98(3). S234–S234. 3 indexed citations
18.
Daniluk, Judith C. & Emily Koert. (2012). The other side of the fertility coin: a comparison of childless men’s and women’s knowledge of fertility and assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and Sterility. 99(3). 839–846. 87 indexed citations
19.
Daniluk, Judith C. & Emily Koert. (2012). Childless Canadian men's and women's childbearing intentions, attitudes towards and willingness to use assisted human reproduction. Human Reproduction. 27(8). 2405–2412. 54 indexed citations
20.
Daniluk, Judith C., Emily Koert, & Anthony P. Cheung. (2011). Childless women’s knowledge of fertility and assisted human reproduction: identifying the gaps. Fertility and Sterility. 97(2). 420–426. 138 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrea Mechanick Braverman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mariana V. Martins Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kathleen S. Slauson‐Blevins Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Veerle Provoost Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eline Dancet Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Satvinder Purewal Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sally Sheldon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marilyn Crawshaw Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by L. Jill Halman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tewes Wischmann
Rankless by CCL
2026