Ling‐Zhong Lin
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Marketing top 10%
- Topics
- Multi-Criteria Decision Making (11 papers)Color perception and design (11 papers)Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (10 papers)
- Cited by
- Management of Technology and InnovationMarketingOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Journals
- Tourism ManagementExpert Systems with ApplicationsInternational Journal of Hospitality Management
- Partner nations
- Taiwan
In The Last Decade
Ling‐Zhong Lin
26 papers receiving 427 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Sociology and Political Science 175
- Management Science and Operations Research 108
- Management of Technology and Innovation 101
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 100
- Marketing 89
Countries citing papers authored by Ling‐Zhong Lin
This map shows the geographic impact of Ling‐Zhong Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ling‐Zhong Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ling‐Zhong Lin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ling‐Zhong Lin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ling‐Zhong Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ling‐Zhong Lin. The network helps show where Ling‐Zhong Lin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ling‐Zhong Lin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ling‐Zhong Lin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ling‐Zhong Lin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ling‐Zhong Lin. Ling‐Zhong Lin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 47 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | 49 |
About Ling‐Zhong Lin
Ling‐Zhong Lin is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 28 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multi-Criteria Decision Making (11 papers), Color perception and design (11 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (101 citations), Marketing (89 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (100 citations). Ling‐Zhong Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Huery-Ren Yeh, Tsuen‐Ho Hsu, Ming‐Chao Wang, Liang‐Chih Huang and Cheng‐Fei Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Tourism Management, Expert Systems with Applications and International Journal of Hospitality Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.