Linda Wallace
- Information Systems top 0.5%
- Management Information Systems top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Information Systems and Management top 1%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 2%
- Co-authors
- Mark KeilArun RaiSteven D. SheetzWeiguo FanZhongju ZhangStephanie RichTabitha JamesMerrill Warkentin
- Topics
- Software Engineering Research (8 papers)Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (7 papers)Digital Marketing and Social Media (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenCanada
In The Last Decade
Linda Wallace
25 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
- Information Systems 850
- Management Information Systems 610
- Sociology and Political Science 443
- Information Systems and Management 351
- Management Science and Operations Research 309
Countries citing papers authored by Linda Wallace
This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Wallace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Wallace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Wallace more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Wallace
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Wallace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Wallace. The network helps show where Linda Wallace may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda Wallace
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda Wallace. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda Wallace based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda Wallace. Linda Wallace is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 99 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 102 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 43 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 230 | |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | 51 | |
| 14 | 275 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 202 | |
| 17 | 361 | |
| 18 | 294 | |
| 19 | 117 | |
| 20 | The development of an instrument to measure software project risk | 21 |
About Linda Wallace
Linda Wallace is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Communication and Management Information Systems, having authored 25 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (8 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (7 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (610 citations), Information Systems and Management (351 citations) and Software (169 citations). Linda Wallace has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mark Keil, Arun Rai, Steven D. Sheetz, Weiguo Fan, Zhongju Zhang, Stephanie Rich, Tabitha James, Merrill Warkentin, Jason K. Deane and Reza Barkhi. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, MIS Quarterly and Journal of Business Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.