Linda Kamas
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 6
-
- Economic Theory and Policy 8
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact 6
- Safety Research top 2%
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies 13
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Finance top 10%
- Global Financial Crisis and Policies 7
-
- Culture, Economy, and Development Studies 5
- History and Politics in Latin America 2
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 4
- Co-authors
- Anne PrestonJoseph P. JoyceSandy Baum
- Journals
- World Development (1 paper)Journal of Development Economics (1 paper)Journal of International Economics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Linda Kamas
26 papers receiving 474 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- General Decision Sciences 61
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 171
- Safety Research 159
- Gender Studies 87
- Finance 86
Countries citing papers authored by Linda Kamas
This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Kamas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Kamas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Kamas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Kamas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Kamas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Kamas. The network helps show where Linda Kamas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Linda Kamas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 71 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 7 | The Importance of Being Confident | 2012 | 26 |
| 8 | 2011 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 40 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 12 | ALTRUISTIC RESPONSES TO THE SEPTEMBER 11 TERRORIST ATTACKS: SOME EVIDENCE FROM DICTATOR GAMES | 2005 | 4 |
| 13 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 25 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 28 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1986 | 27 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 16 |
About Linda Kamas
Linda Kamas is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Safety Research and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 26 papers that have together received 552 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (13 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (8 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (7 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (6 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers) and History and Politics in Latin America (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (61 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (171 citations) and Safety Research (159 citations). Linda Kamas has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anne Preston, Joseph P. Joyce and Sandy Baum. Their work appears in journals such as World Development, Journal of Development Economics and Journal of International Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.