Linda Dégh
- Literature and Literary Theory top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Gender Studies
- Co-authors
- Andrew VázsonyiBill EllisJohn D. NilesRichard M. DorsonFelix J. OinasHenry GlassieFrancis Lee UtleyUlf Hannerz
- Topics
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (27 papers)European Linguistics and Anthropology (5 papers)Historical and Archaeological Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Linda Dégh
27 papers receiving 120 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Literature and Literary Theory 151
- Sociology and Political Science 64
- Philosophy 43
- Anthropology 40
- Gender Studies 34
Countries citing papers authored by Linda Dégh
This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Dégh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Dégh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Dégh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Dégh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Dégh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Dégh. The network helps show where Linda Dégh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda Dégh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda Dégh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda Dégh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda Dégh. Linda Dégh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hungarian Folktales: The Art of Zsuzsanna Palk- | 0 |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Folktales and society : story-telling in a Hungarian peasant community : expanded edition with a new afterword | 0 |
| 7 | Review of Struggle and Hope: The Hungarian-Canadian Experience By N. F. Dreisziger with M. L. Kovacs, Paul Body, and Bennett Kovrig | 1 |
| 8 | Über Märchen für Kinder von heute : Essays zu ihrem Wandel und ihrer Funktion | 2 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | People in the Tobacco Belt: Four Lives | 1 |
| 11 | Indiana Folklore: A Reader | 8 |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | Folklore today : a Festschrift for Richard M. Dorson | 8 |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Linda Dégh
Linda Dégh is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology and History, having authored 44 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (27 papers), European Linguistics and Anthropology (5 papers) and Historical and Archaeological Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (151 citations), Music (14 citations) and Anthropology (40 citations). Linda Dégh has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Vázsonyi, Bill Ellis, John D. Niles, Richard M. Dorson, Felix J. Oinas, Henry Glassie, Francis Lee Utley, Ulf Hannerz, Margaret Lantis and James Ritchie. Their work appears in journals such as American Anthropologist, Current Anthropology and History of Education Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.