John D. Niles
Impact in
- Classics top 0.1%
- Medieval Literature and History
-
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- Themes in Literature Analysis
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Andrew TaylorJohn M. FerronRobert F. DedrickMelinda R. HessKristine Y. HogartyAllen J. FrantzenReginald LeeJeffrey D. Kromrey
- Journals
- Journal of American Folklore (7 papers)The Modern Language Review (4 papers)Western Folklore (4 papers)College English (4 papers)Exemplaria (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John D. Niles
49 papers receiving 465 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Classics 265
- Literature and Literary Theory 171
- Language and Linguistics 141
- History 138
- Linguistics and Language 27
Countries citing papers authored by John D. Niles
This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Niles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Niles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Niles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Niles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Niles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Niles. The network helps show where John D. Niles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John D. Niles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 2 | Hawks, Horses, and Huns: The Impact of Peoples of the Steppe on the Folk Cultures of Northern Europe | 2016 | 0 |
| 3 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 5 | Introduction: From Word to Print-And Beyond | 2013 | 4 |
| 6 | 2009 | 136 | |
| 7 | Klaeber's Beowulf and The fight at Finnsburg | 2008 | 51 |
| 8 | Beowulf : an illustrated edition | 2008 | 0 |
| 9 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 11 | Traditional Gaelic Bagpiping, 1745-1945 | 2004 | 0 |
| 12 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 50 | |
| 14 | Widsith and the Anthropology of the Past | 1999 | 5 |
| 15 | 1998 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 22 | |
| 18 | 1983 | 16 | |
| 19 | 1977 | 1 | |
| 20 | Ring-Composition in La Chanson de Roland and La Chançun de Willame. | 1973 | 3 |
About John D. Niles
John D. Niles is a scholar working on Classics, History, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory and Music, having authored 58 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (30 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (10 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (9 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (7 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (5 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Medieval and Early Modern Justice (2 papers) and Historical Legal Studies and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (265 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (171 citations), Language and Linguistics (141 citations), History (138 citations) and Linguistics and Language (27 citations). John D. Niles has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Taylor, John M. Ferron, Robert F. Dedrick, Melinda R. Hess, Kristine Y. Hogarty, Allen J. Frantzen, Reginald Lee, Jeffrey D. Kromrey, R. D. Fulk and Stanley B. Greenfield. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American Folklore, The Modern Language Review, Western Folklore, College English and Exemplaria.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.