Linda A. Macaulay

699 total citations
30 papers, 446 citations indexed

About

Linda A. Macaulay is a scholar working on Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Linda A. Macaulay has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 446 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Information Systems, 9 papers in Information Systems and Management and 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Linda A. Macaulay's work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (13 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (9 papers) and Software Engineering Research (6 papers). Linda A. Macaulay is often cited by papers focused on Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (13 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (9 papers) and Software Engineering Research (6 papers). Linda A. Macaulay collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Cyprus and Malta. Linda A. Macaulay's co-authors include Prodromos Chatzoglou, Georgios Dafoulas, Kathleen Keeling, Peter McGoldrick, Noorminshah A. Iahad, George Dafoulas, Debbie Keeling, Liping Zhao, Paul Layzell and Ab Razak Che Hussin and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Project Management, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and Information Systems Journal.

In The Last Decade

Linda A. Macaulay

28 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Linda A. Macaulay United Kingdom 13 217 85 83 82 53 30 446
Joline Morrison United States 10 99 0.5× 67 0.8× 80 1.0× 58 0.7× 67 1.3× 23 416
Antonio de Amescua Seco Spain 15 339 1.6× 73 0.9× 165 2.0× 56 0.7× 40 0.8× 70 624
Helena Alvelos Portugal 12 136 0.6× 50 0.6× 99 1.2× 118 1.4× 39 0.7× 28 581
Mitzi G. Pitts United States 7 156 0.7× 57 0.7× 106 1.3× 114 1.4× 90 1.7× 10 494
David P. Hale United States 11 299 1.4× 83 1.0× 77 0.9× 38 0.5× 41 0.8× 47 459
Randall Whitaker United States 9 107 0.5× 69 0.8× 49 0.6× 91 1.1× 24 0.5× 25 381
Marı́a-Isabel Sánchez-Segura Spain 12 330 1.5× 119 1.4× 91 1.1× 50 0.6× 44 0.8× 59 598
Robert P. Cerveny United States 12 169 0.8× 55 0.6× 104 1.3× 136 1.7× 133 2.5× 30 551
Renata Mendes de Araújo Brazil 12 175 0.8× 49 0.6× 120 1.4× 57 0.7× 39 0.7× 96 390
Cristina Casado‐Lumbreras Spain 13 233 1.1× 54 0.6× 88 1.1× 32 0.4× 28 0.5× 31 463

Countries citing papers authored by Linda A. Macaulay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Linda A. Macaulay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda A. Macaulay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda A. Macaulay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Linda A. Macaulay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda A. Macaulay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda A. Macaulay. The network helps show where Linda A. Macaulay may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda A. Macaulay

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda A. Macaulay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda A. Macaulay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda A. Macaulay. Linda A. Macaulay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Macaulay, Linda A., et al.. (2013). Collaboration Model for SSMEnetUK : A Service Science Perspective. CentAUR (University of Reading). 1 indexed citations
2.
Macaulay, Linda A., et al.. (2011). Factors affecting regional SMEs progression to Digital Business Ecosystems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2 indexed citations
3.
Papamichail, K N, et al.. (2010). Enquiry-based learning: exploring the potential of virtual worlds (SecondLife). International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning. 2(4). 321–321. 2 indexed citations
4.
Hussin, Ab Razak Che, Linda A. Macaulay, & Kathleen Keeling. (2007). The importance ranking of trust attributes in e-Commerce website. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 99. 12 indexed citations
5.
Macaulay, Linda A., et al.. (2007). Co-evolving E-tail and On-Line Communities: Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 11(4). 53–77. 34 indexed citations
6.
Macaulay, Linda A., et al.. (2007). Adoption of ICT among small business: vision vs. reality. International Journal of Electronic Business. 5(2). 188–188. 13 indexed citations
7.
Zhao, Liping, et al.. (2006). A Model Driven Architecture for Enterprise Application Integration. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 181c–181c. 13 indexed citations
8.
Iahad, Noorminshah A., et al.. (2004). Evaluation of online assessment: the role of feedback in learner-centered e-learning. 10 pp.–10 pp.. 34 indexed citations
9.
Keeling, Kathleen, et al.. (2001). Measuring Purchasing Intentions for Internet Retail Sites against Usability Attributes.. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 76–83. 7 indexed citations
10.
Keeling, Kathleen, et al.. (2001). TV Home Banking and the Technology Acceptance Model: Intrinsic Motivation and Gender Issues.. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 84–91. 1 indexed citations
11.
Brereton, O. Pearl, et al.. (2000). Student group working across universities: a case study in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Education. 43(4). 394–399. 11 indexed citations
12.
Macaulay, Linda A.. (1999). Seven-Layer Model of the Role of the Facilitator in Requirements Engineering. Requirements Engineering. 4(1). 38–59. 15 indexed citations
13.
Chatzoglou, Prodromos & Linda A. Macaulay. (1997). The importance of human factors in planning the requirements capture stage of a project. International Journal of Project Management. 15(1). 39–53. 21 indexed citations
14.
Chatzoglou, Prodromos & Linda A. Macaulay. (1996). Requirements capture and analysis: A survey of current practice. Requirements Engineering. 1(2). 75–87. 29 indexed citations
15.
Chatzoglou, Prodromos & Linda A. Macaulay. (1996). A review of existing models for project planning and estimation and the need for a new approach. International Journal of Project Management. 14(3). 173–183. 25 indexed citations
16.
Chatzoglou, Prodromos & Linda A. Macaulay. (1995). Requirements capture and analysis: the project manager's dilemma. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology. 8(3/4). 190–202. 6 indexed citations
17.
Layzell, Paul & Linda A. Macaulay. (1994). An investigation into software maintenance—Perception and practices. Journal of Software Maintenance Research and Practice. 6(3). 105–120. 10 indexed citations
18.
Fowler, Christopher, et al.. (1990). Historical analysis: a method for evaluating requirements capture methodologies. Interacting with Computers. 2(2). 190–204. 1 indexed citations
19.
Fowler, Christopher, et al.. (1988). Overcoming obstacles to the validation of user requirements specifications. 111–122. 2 indexed citations
20.
Fowler, Christopher, et al.. (1987). An evaluation of the effectiveness of the adaptive interface module (AIM) in matching dialogues to users. 345–359. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026