Lincoln Smıth

1.8k citations
65 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 19

Lincoln Smıth

65 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Lincoln Smıth
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Insect Science 839
  • Plant Science 690
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 341
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 142
  • Ecology 177
Replace Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate with:
Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate Canada
W. A. Palmer Australia
A. S. McClay Canada
A. Gaßmann Switzerland
Eric Wyss Switzerland
Stephen D. Hight United States
Robert S. Bourchier Canada
E. S. Delfosse United States
M. Tracy Johnson United States
Ian V MacRae United States
Lincoln Smıth relative to Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate Canada Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lincoln Smıth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lincoln Smıth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lincoln Smıth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lincoln Smıth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lincoln Smıth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lincoln Smıth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lincoln Smıth. The network helps show where Lincoln Smıth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lincoln Smıth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lincoln Smıth Line = papers co-authored together Lincoln Smıth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20194
2 20172
3 20173
4 201610
5 20165
6 20158
7 20154
8 20145
9 20119
10 200975
11 20096
12 20088
13 20085
14 200837
15 20081
16 200622
17 20068
18
Psylliodes chalcomerus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Alticinae), a flea beetle candidate for biological control of yellow starthistle Centaurea solstitialis.
20041
19 200039
20 198918

About Lincoln Smıth

Lincoln Smıth is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biological Control of Invasive Species (53 papers), Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (28 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (25 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (22 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (8 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (839 citations), Plant Science (690 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (341 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (142 citations) and Ecology (177 citations). Lincoln Smıth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and France. Frequent co-authors include Massimo Cristofaro, James W. Amrine, John J. Beck, Peter Rice, Jim M. Story, Enrico de Lillo, Anna Skoracka, G. N. Oldfield, J. K. Balciunas and William R. Good. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Control, Environmental Entomology, Biocontrol Science and Technology, Experimental and Applied Acarology and BioControl.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026