S. L. Clement

1.4k total citations
51 papers, 851 citations indexed

About

S. L. Clement is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, S. L. Clement has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 851 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Insect Science, 29 papers in Plant Science and 20 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in S. L. Clement's work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (19 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (14 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (12 papers). S. L. Clement is often cited by papers focused on Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (19 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (14 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (12 papers). S. L. Clement collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and Australia. S. L. Clement's co-authors include Leslie R. Elberson, Richard T. Lovell, Kelly D. Craven, Christopher L. Schardl, Adrian Leuchtmann, Christina D. Moon, A. D. Wilson, Christine M. Davitt, D. C. Hardie and Marc A. Evans and has published in prestigious journals such as Molecular Ecology, Aquaculture and Crop Science.

In The Last Decade

S. L. Clement

50 papers receiving 765 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. L. Clement United States 15 401 366 260 237 121 51 851
Maria Agnese Sabatini Italy 14 169 0.4× 226 0.6× 204 0.8× 87 0.4× 64 0.5× 51 513
Abner M. Hammond United States 16 407 1.0× 346 0.9× 599 2.3× 382 1.6× 110 0.9× 33 1.0k
Gerald L. Kreitner United States 16 268 0.7× 317 0.9× 89 0.3× 270 1.1× 52 0.4× 31 607
Ange-Marie Risterucci France 12 184 0.5× 629 1.7× 56 0.2× 265 1.1× 87 0.7× 37 1.0k
Kirsten D Scott Australia 17 235 0.6× 865 2.4× 341 1.3× 490 2.1× 70 0.6× 27 1.3k
A. M. Olivieri Italy 10 233 0.6× 1.2k 3.2× 58 0.2× 439 1.9× 159 1.3× 23 1.7k
Richard V. Kesseli United States 12 163 0.4× 415 1.1× 31 0.1× 178 0.8× 50 0.4× 16 649
Jean‐Marie Prosperi France 24 307 0.8× 1.2k 3.2× 64 0.2× 260 1.1× 66 0.5× 37 1.5k
Tommy E. Thompson United States 14 148 0.4× 585 1.6× 88 0.3× 167 0.7× 45 0.4× 72 810
H. H. Ho United States 16 125 0.3× 646 1.8× 81 0.3× 281 1.2× 349 2.9× 77 841

Countries citing papers authored by S. L. Clement

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. L. Clement's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. L. Clement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. L. Clement more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. L. Clement

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. L. Clement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. L. Clement. The network helps show where S. L. Clement may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. L. Clement

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. L. Clement. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. L. Clement based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. L. Clement. S. L. Clement is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Levine, Eli, et al.. (2017). A Low Cost and Labor Efficient Method for Rearing Black Cutworms (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). The Great Lakes Entomologist. 15(1).
2.
3.
Clement, S. L.. (2009). Variable effects of fungal endophyte-infected grasses on the performance of pestiferous aphids.. Redia-Giornale Di Zoologia. 92. 205–209. 1 indexed citations
4.
Clement, S. L., et al.. (2009). Non-target plant use by a weed biocontrol agent in idaho: host expansion or opportunistic behavior?. Biocontrol Science and Technology. 19(4). 455–461. 6 indexed citations
5.
Clement, S. L., et al.. (2007). High neotyphodium infection frequencies in tillers and seed of infected wild tall fescue plants. NZGA Research and Practice Series. 13. 49–52. 1 indexed citations
6.
Reed, K. F. M., et al.. (2004). Improving tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) for cool-season vigour. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 44(9). 873–881. 35 indexed citations
7.
Moon, Christina D., Kelly D. Craven, Adrian Leuchtmann, S. L. Clement, & Christopher L. Schardl. (2004). Prevalence of interspecific hybrids amongst asexual fungal endophytes of grasses. Molecular Ecology. 13(6). 1455–1467. 180 indexed citations
8.
Clement, S. L., et al.. (2003). Variable Hessian fly (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) populations in cereal production systems in eastern Washington. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 76(4). 567–577. 10 indexed citations
9.
Quisenberry, S. S. & S. L. Clement. (2002). Conservation and use of global plant genetic resources for insect resistance. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(8). 865–872. 7 indexed citations
10.
Clement, S. L., et al.. (1993). Research achievements in plant resistance to insect pests of cool season food legumes. Euphytica. 73(1-2). 41–50. 13 indexed citations
11.
Clement, S. L., Keith S. Pike, W. J. Kaiser, & A. D. Wilson. (1990). Resistance of Endophyte-Infected Plants of Tall Fescue and Perennial Ryegrass to the Russian Wheat Aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 63(4). 646–648. 3 indexed citations
12.
Clement, S. L., et al.. (1990). Screening wild Hordeum species for resistance to Russian wheat aphid.. Cereal Research Communications. 18(3). 173–177. 11 indexed citations
13.
Clement, S. L., et al.. (1988). Host specificity of adult Eustenopus hirtus (Waltl) (Coeloptera: Curculionidae), a potential biological control agent of yellow starthistle, Centaurea solstitialis L. (Asteraceae, Cardueae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington. 904(4). 501–507. 8 indexed citations
14.
Clement, S. L., L. V. Kaster, William B. Showers, & Rouven Schmidt. (1985). Seasonal changes in the reproductive condition of female black cutworm moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 58(1). 62–68. 8 indexed citations
15.
Levine, Errol, S. L. Clement, & David McCartney. (1984). Effect of Seedling Injury by the Stalk Borer (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Regrowth and Yield of Corn1. Journal of Economic Entomology. 77(1). 167–170. 9 indexed citations
16.
Clement, S. L., et al.. (1982). Black cutworm pheromone trapping in strawberries. California Agriculture. 36(7). 20–21. 10 indexed citations
17.
Clement, S. L. & Robert F. Norris. (1982). Two insects offer potential biological control of common purslane. California Agriculture. 36(2). 16–18. 5 indexed citations
18.
Birch, M. C., et al.. (1977). Pheromone traps to suppress populations of the smaller European elm bark beetle. California Agriculture. 31(11). 4–7. 3 indexed citations
19.
Rust, Richard W. & S. L. Clement. (1972). The biology of Osmia glauca and Osmia nemoris (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 45(4). 523–528. 9 indexed citations
20.
Clement, S. L., et al.. (1958). The Changing Structure of the Fertilizer Industry in the United States. Journal of Farm Economics. 40(5). 1186–1186. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026