Thomas M. Stoker

6.3k total citations · 2 hit papers
47 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

Thomas M. Stoker is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas M. Stoker has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 14 papers in Statistics and Probability and 10 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance. Recurrent topics in Thomas M. Stoker's work include Statistical Methods and Inference (10 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (9 papers) and Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (8 papers). Thomas M. Stoker is often cited by papers focused on Statistical Methods and Inference (10 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (9 papers) and Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (8 papers). Thomas M. Stoker collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Thomas M. Stoker's co-authors include Wolfgang Karl Härdle, Richard Schmalensee, James L. Powell, Ruth Judson, James H. Stock, Tavneet Suri, Richard Blundell, Benjamin Marx, Roberto Rigobón and Whitney K. Newey and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Statistical Association and American Economic Review.

In The Last Decade

Thomas M. Stoker

45 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Hit Papers

Semiparametric Estimation of Index Coefficients 1989 2026 2001 2013 1989 1998 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas M. Stoker United States 23 1.8k 1.3k 462 441 337 47 3.5k
David E. A. Giles Canada 29 1.7k 1.0× 762 0.6× 524 1.1× 89 0.2× 508 1.5× 141 3.1k
Aman Ullah United States 25 3.3k 1.8× 977 0.8× 1.2k 2.7× 468 1.1× 1.0k 3.1× 98 5.1k
Ingmar R. Prucha United States 33 5.8k 3.3× 522 0.4× 694 1.5× 75 0.2× 493 1.5× 64 7.0k
Lung‐fei Lee United States 35 4.5k 2.5× 422 0.3× 656 1.4× 162 0.4× 379 1.1× 127 5.9k
P. A. V. B. Swamy United States 27 2.6k 1.5× 545 0.4× 1.5k 3.3× 363 0.8× 797 2.4× 126 4.1k
Mark F. J. Steel United Kingdom 35 3.0k 1.7× 1.7k 1.3× 1.4k 3.1× 142 0.3× 1.7k 4.9× 128 6.2k
Edward W. Frees United States 30 2.0k 1.1× 1.2k 0.9× 304 0.7× 245 0.6× 1.0k 3.0× 91 4.4k
Moshe Buchinsky United States 17 2.0k 1.1× 577 0.4× 434 0.9× 74 0.2× 415 1.2× 35 3.5k
Lung-Fei Lee United States 19 3.2k 1.8× 401 0.3× 307 0.7× 71 0.2× 254 0.8× 28 4.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Stoker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Stoker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Stoker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Stoker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Stoker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Stoker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Stoker. The network helps show where Thomas M. Stoker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas M. Stoker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas M. Stoker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas M. Stoker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas M. Stoker. Thomas M. Stoker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jorgenson, Dale W., Lawrence J. Lau, & Thomas M. Stoker. (2016). Welfare Comparison under Exact Aggregation. American Economic Review. 70(2). 268–272. 9 indexed citations
2.
Marx, Benjamin, Thomas M. Stoker, & Tavneet Suri. (2013). The Economics of Slums in the Developing World. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 27(4). 187–210. 250 indexed citations
3.
Rigobón, Roberto & Thomas M. Stoker. (2009). Bias From Censored Regressors. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics. 27(3). 340–353. 52 indexed citations
4.
Aı̈t-Sahalia, Yacine, Peter J. Bickel, & Thomas M. Stoker. (2001). Goodness-of-fit tests for kernel regression with an application to option implied volatilities. Journal of Econometrics. 105(2). 363–412. 74 indexed citations
5.
Blundell, Richard & Thomas M. Stoker. (2000). Models of Aggregate Economic Relationships that Account for Heterogeneity. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 11 indexed citations
6.
Schmalensee, Richard & Thomas M. Stoker. (1999). Household Gasoline Demand in the United States. Econometrica. 67(3). 645–662. 97 indexed citations
7.
Judson, Ruth, Richard Schmalensee, & Thomas M. Stoker. (1999). Economic Development and the Structure of the Demand for Commercial Energy. The Energy Journal. 20(2). 29–57. 83 indexed citations
8.
Stoker, Thomas M.. (1996). Smoothing bias in the measurement of marginal effects. Journal of Econometrics. 72(1-2). 49–84. 4 indexed citations
9.
Powell, James L. & Thomas M. Stoker. (1996). Optimal bandwidth choice for density-weighted averages. Journal of Econometrics. 75(2). 291–316. 66 indexed citations
10.
Schmalensee, Richard, Thomas M. Stoker, & Ruth Judson. (1995). World energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions : 1950-2050. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 14 indexed citations
11.
Newey, Whitney K. & Thomas M. Stoker. (1993). Efficiency of Weighted Average Derivative Estimators and Index Models. Econometrica. 61(5). 1199–1199. 79 indexed citations
12.
Powell, James L., James H. Stock, & Thomas M. Stoker. (1989). Semiparametric Estimation of Index Coefficients. Econometrica. 57(6). 1403–1403. 626 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & Thomas M. Stoker. (1989). Investigating Smooth Multiple Regression by the Method of Average Derivatives. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 84(408). 986–995. 424 indexed citations
14.
Jorgenson, Dale W., et al.. (1987). Two Stage Budgeting and Consumer Demand for Energy. 7 indexed citations
15.
Stoker, Thomas M.. (1986). The Distributional Welfare Effects of Rising Prices in the United States: The 1970's Experience. American Economic Review. 76(3). 335–349. 11 indexed citations
16.
Stoker, Thomas M.. (1986). Simple Tests of Distributional Effects on Macroeconomic Equations. Journal of Political Economy. 94(4). 763–795. 70 indexed citations
17.
Stoker, Thomas M.. (1985). Aggregation, Structural Change, and Cross-Section Estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 80(391). 720–729. 14 indexed citations
18.
Powell, James L. & Thomas M. Stoker. (1985). The estimation of complete aggregation structures. Journal of Econometrics. 30(1-2). 317–344. 10 indexed citations
19.
Stoker, Thomas M.. (1985). Aggregation, Structural Change, and Cross-Section Estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 80(391). 720–720. 2 indexed citations
20.
Stoker, Thomas M.. (1982). The Use of Cross-Section Data to Characterize Macro Functions. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 77(378). 369–369. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026